PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LCTD vs. CNRG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between LCTD and CNRG is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

LCTD vs. CNRG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-1.19%
-1.77%
LCTD
CNRG

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LCTD:

0.37

CNRG:

-0.40

Sortino Ratio

LCTD:

0.59

CNRG:

-0.38

Omega Ratio

LCTD:

1.07

CNRG:

0.96

Calmar Ratio

LCTD:

0.49

CNRG:

-0.20

Martin Ratio

LCTD:

1.38

CNRG:

-0.87

Ulcer Index

LCTD:

3.47%

CNRG:

13.85%

Daily Std Dev

LCTD:

12.94%

CNRG:

30.46%

Max Drawdown

LCTD:

-29.82%

CNRG:

-59.60%

Current Drawdown

LCTD:

-9.05%

CNRG:

-55.92%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 3.67% return, which is significantly higher than CNRG's -12.91% return.


LCTD

YTD

3.67%

1M

-1.13%

6M

-1.19%

1Y

4.50%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

CNRG

YTD

-12.91%

1M

-2.72%

6M

-1.77%

1Y

-12.65%

5Y*

9.03%

10Y*

N/A

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCTD vs. CNRG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than CNRG's 0.45% expense ratio.


CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
Expense ratio chart for CNRG: current value at 0.45% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.45%
Expense ratio chart for LCTD: current value at 0.20% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.20%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LCTD vs. CNRG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LCTD, currently valued at 0.37, compared to the broader market0.002.004.000.37-0.40
The chart of Sortino ratio for LCTD, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.008.0010.000.59-0.38
The chart of Omega ratio for LCTD, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.002.503.001.070.96
The chart of Calmar ratio for LCTD, currently valued at 0.49, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.000.49-0.25
The chart of Martin ratio for LCTD, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.001.38-0.87
LCTD
CNRG

The current LCTD Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is higher than the CNRG Sharpe Ratio of -0.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCTD and CNRG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.37
-0.40
LCTD
CNRG

Dividends

LCTD vs. CNRG - Dividend Comparison

LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than CNRG's 1.32% yield.


TTM202320222021202020192018
LCTD
BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF
3.72%3.16%3.52%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CNRG
SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF
1.32%1.17%1.23%1.34%0.69%1.16%0.35%

Drawdowns

LCTD vs. CNRG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum CNRG drawdown of -59.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and CNRG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-9.05%
-42.89%
LCTD
CNRG

Volatility

LCTD vs. CNRG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 3.59%, while SPDR S&P Kensho Clean Power ETF (CNRG) has a volatility of 7.36%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNRG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
3.59%
7.36%
LCTD
CNRG
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab