LCTD vs. NLR
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR).
LCTD and NLR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. LCTD is an actively managed fund by BlackRock. It was launched on Apr 8, 2021. NLR is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the DAXglobal Nuclear Energy Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2007.
Performance
LCTD vs. NLR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCTD vs. NLR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 2.78% | 30.42% | 3.14% | 17.10% | -16.16% | 4.36% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 8.18% | 56.50% | 14.26% | 36.67% | 2.29% | 4.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCTD achieves a 2.78% return, which is significantly lower than NLR's 8.18% return.
LCTD
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -4.78%
- YTD
- 2.78%
- 6M
- 6.42%
- 1Y
- 25.79%
- 3Y*
- 14.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NLR
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -12.66%
- YTD
- 8.18%
- 6M
- 0.14%
- 1Y
- 85.99%
- 3Y*
- 37.72%
- 5Y*
- 23.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCTD vs. NLR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCTD has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than NLR's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCTD vs. NLR — Risk / Return Rank
LCTD
NLR
LCTD vs. NLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) and VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCTD | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.51 | 2.05 | -0.54 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.10 | 2.62 | -0.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.33 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.41 | 3.41 | -1.00 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.04 | 8.20 | +0.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCTD | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.51 | 2.05 | -0.54 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.18 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCTD and NLR is 0.59, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCTD vs. NLR - Dividend Comparison
LCTD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than NLR's 2.36% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCTD BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF | 3.51% | 3.61% | 3.74% | 3.16% | 3.52% | 2.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NLR VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF | 2.36% | 2.55% | 0.76% | 4.54% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 2.23% | 2.21% | 3.91% | 4.86% | 3.62% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
LCTD vs. NLR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCTD drawdown since its inception was -29.82%, smaller than the maximum NLR drawdown of -65.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCTD and NLR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCTD | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.82% | -65.05% | +35.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.92% | -25.80% | +14.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.46% | -18.26% | +11.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.91% | -35.90% | +28.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.91% | 10.73% | -7.82% |
Volatility
LCTD vs. NLR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BlackRock World ex U.S. Carbon Transition Readiness ETF (LCTD) is 7.20%, while VanEck Vectors Uranium+Nuclear Energy ETF (NLR) has a volatility of 12.53%. This indicates that LCTD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCTD | NLR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.20% | 12.53% | -5.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.09% | 32.94% | -21.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.12% | 42.20% | -25.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 28.16% | -12.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.03% | 23.38% | -7.35% |