LCO vs. AOR
LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and AOR (iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. LCO is actively managed, while AOR is passively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOR.
Performance
LCO vs. AOR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
LCO
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.61%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AOR
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 1.18%
- YTD
- 7.57%
- 6M
- 7.52%
- 1Y
- 19.17%
- 3Y*
- 14.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.08%
- 10Y*
- 8.67%
LCO vs. AOR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 11.44% |
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 6.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCO and AOR is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2026 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCO vs. AOR — Risk / Return Rank
LCO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
AOR
LCO vs. AOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF (AOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LCO | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.41 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.45 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LCO vs. AOR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum AOR drawdown of -24.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and AOR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCO | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.20% | -24.44% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -22.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -0.36% | -3.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.49% | -3.47% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.54% | — |
Volatility
LCO vs. AOR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCO | AOR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.39% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.40% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.73% | 8.89% | +16.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 10.63% | +15.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.73% | 10.70% | +15.03% |
LCO vs. AOR - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than AOR's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCO vs. AOR - Dividend Comparison
LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AOR iShares Core 60/40 Balanced Allocation ETF | 2.46% | 2.55% | 2.66% | 2.50% | 2.12% | 1.64% | 1.89% | 2.56% | 2.49% | 4.51% | 2.16% | 2.12% |
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LCO and AOR have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AOR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AOR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.
AOR has the higher dividend yield at 2.46%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.
They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.15% for AOR.
Find the right allocation for LCO and AOR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer