LCO vs. AOA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LCO (LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF) and AOA (iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. LCO is actively managed, while AOA is passively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LCO charges 1.13%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for AOA.

Performance

LCO vs. AOA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

LCO

• 1D: -1.30%
• 1M: 4.15%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AOA

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 3.39%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 10.89%
• 1Y: 24.17%
• 3Y*: 17.70%
• 5Y*: 9.19%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCO vs. AOA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF	14.19%
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF	8.57%

Correlation

The correlation between LCO and AOA is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2026	0.71

Return for Risk

LCO vs. AOA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AOA

AOA Risk / Return Rank: 70
AOA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
AOA Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AOA Omega Ratio Rank: 72
AOA Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
AOA Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCO vs. AOA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF (LCO) and iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF (AOA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LCO	AOA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.71	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.78	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.62	0.69	+0.93

Drawdowns

LCO vs. AOA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCO drawdown since its inception was -11.20%, smaller than the maximum AOA drawdown of -28.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCO and AOA.

Drawdown Indicators

	LCO	AOA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.20%	-28.38%	+17.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-12.94%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.62%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.38%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.30%	-0.31%	-0.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-4.05%	-0.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.85%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	LCO	AOA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.51%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.63%	10.63%	+14.00%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.63%	12.97%	+11.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.63%	13.54%	+11.09%

LCO vs. AOA - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCO has a 1.13% expense ratio, which is higher than AOA's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

LCO vs. AOA - Dividend Comparison

LCO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AOA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AOA iShares Core 80/20 Aggressive Allocation ETF	2.04%	2.18%	2.30%	2.22%	2.10%	1.67%	1.71%	2.50%	2.37%	5.09%	2.26%	2.15%
LCO LOGIQ Contrarian Opportunities ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LCO and AOA in my portfolio?

LCO and AOA have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, LCO or AOA?

On fees, AOA is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, LCO or AOA?

AOA is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.13% for LCO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LCO or AOA?

AOA has the higher dividend yield at 2.04%, compared with 0.00% for LCO.

What is the main difference between LCO and AOA?

They also come from different issuers: LOGIQ and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.13% for LCO and 0.15% for AOA.