LCGFX vs. GCOW
Compare and contrast key facts about William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW).
LCGFX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. GCOW is a passively managed fund by Pacer that tracks the performance of the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index. It was launched on Feb 23, 2016.
Performance
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | -15.23% | 11.79% | 26.09% | 40.48% | -32.48% | 28.29% | 36.64% | 36.44% | 5.18% | 31.29% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 13.21% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCGFX achieves a -15.23% return, which is significantly lower than GCOW's 13.21% return. Over the past 10 years, LCGFX has outperformed GCOW with an annualized return of 14.43%, while GCOW has yielded a comparatively lower 10.20% annualized return.
LCGFX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- -15.23%
- 6M
- -16.74%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
GCOW
- 1D
- 0.85%
- 1M
- -1.84%
- YTD
- 13.21%
- 6M
- 20.65%
- 1Y
- 31.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.89%
- 5Y*
- 13.65%
- 10Y*
- 10.20%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCGFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than GCOW's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCGFX vs. GCOW — Risk / Return Rank
LCGFX
GCOW
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCGFX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 2.27 | -2.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 3.01 | -2.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.44 | -0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.77 | -2.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 14.12 | -13.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCGFX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 2.27 | -2.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 1.02 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.63 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCGFX and GCOW is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Dividend Comparison
LCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than GCOW's 4.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | 10.10% | 8.56% | 5.97% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 4.29% | 3.83% | 6.46% | 17.08% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 9.86% |
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.39% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCGFX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than GCOW's maximum drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCGFX and GCOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCGFX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -37.64% | -25.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.59% | -11.05% | -9.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.25% | -21.48% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.25% | -37.64% | +0.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -1.84% | -18.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -5.90% | -15.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 2.17% | +4.45% |
Volatility
LCGFX vs. GCOW - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) at 4.03%. This indicates that LCGFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GCOW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCGFX | GCOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 4.03% | +1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 7.90% | +3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 13.89% | +8.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 13.48% | +8.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 16.25% | +4.97% |