LCGFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
LCGFX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Total Return Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LCGFX or SCHG.
Key characteristics
| LCGFX | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 21.71% | 22.17% |
| 1Y Return | 37.25% | 34.88% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 7.91% | 9.95% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 16.87% | 19.68% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 16.00% | 15.99% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 2.10 | 2.00 |
| Daily Std Dev | 16.90% | 17.31% |
| Max Drawdown | -37.25% | -34.59% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.90% | -4.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCGFX and SCHG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
LCGFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LCGFX having a 21.71% return and SCHG slightly higher at 22.17%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCGFX having a 16.00% annualized return and SCHG not far behind at 15.99%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCGFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCGFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LCGFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LCGFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
LCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 4.29% | 3.83% | 6.46% | 17.08% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 9.86% | 9.28% | 7.51% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.33% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.27% | 1.22% | 1.09% | 1.07% |
Drawdowns
LCGFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCGFX drawdown since its inception was -37.25%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCGFX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LCGFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.49% and 5.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.