PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LCGFX vs. SCHG
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


LCGFXSCHG
YTD Return29.22%34.56%
1Y Return39.16%44.80%
3Y Return (Ann)4.87%11.31%
5Y Return (Ann)14.57%21.01%
10Y Return (Ann)10.55%16.83%
Sharpe Ratio2.532.80
Sortino Ratio3.273.58
Omega Ratio1.461.51
Calmar Ratio2.313.87
Martin Ratio13.9915.40
Ulcer Index2.99%3.10%
Daily Std Dev16.48%16.96%
Max Drawdown-39.85%-34.59%
Current Drawdown-0.16%0.00%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.01.0

The correlation between LCGFX and SCHG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

LCGFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LCGFX achieves a 29.22% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 34.56% return. Over the past 10 years, LCGFX has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 10.55%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 16.83% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.96%
20.03%
LCGFX
SCHG

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCGFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCGFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio.


LCGFX
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund
Expense ratio chart for LCGFX: current value at 0.65% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.65%
Expense ratio chart for SCHG: current value at 0.04% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.04%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LCGFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCGFX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 2.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 3.27, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.27
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 1.46, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.46
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 2.31, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.002.31
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LCGFX, currently valued at 13.99, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0013.99
SCHG
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market0.002.004.002.80
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 3.58, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.003.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 1.51, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.51
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 3.87, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.003.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SCHG, currently valued at 15.40, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.0015.40

LCGFX vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.53, which is comparable to the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCGFX and SCHG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.53
2.80
LCGFX
SCHG

Dividends

LCGFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

LCGFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LCGFX
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.11%0.00%0.21%0.28%0.13%0.00%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.40%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%1.09%1.07%

Drawdowns

LCGFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCGFX drawdown since its inception was -39.85%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCGFX and SCHG. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.16%
0
LCGFX
SCHG

Volatility

LCGFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 5.34% and 5.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.34%
5.35%
LCGFX
SCHG