LCGFX vs. SPY
Compare and contrast key facts about William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY).
LCGFX is managed by William Blair. It was launched on Dec 27, 1999. SPY is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Jan 22, 1993.
Performance
LCGFX vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LCGFX vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | -15.23% | 11.79% | 26.09% | 40.48% | -32.48% | 28.29% | 36.64% | 36.44% | 5.18% | 31.29% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | -4.37% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCGFX achieves a -15.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPY's -4.37% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with LCGFX having a 14.43% annualized return and SPY not far behind at 13.98%.
LCGFX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- -8.36%
- YTD
- -15.23%
- 6M
- -16.74%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 14.43%
SPY
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -4.94%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 6M
- -1.82%
- 1Y
- 17.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 11.69%
- 10Y*
- 13.98%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
LCGFX vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCGFX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
LCGFX vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
LCGFX
SPY
LCGFX vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCGFX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.26 | 0.93 | -0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.55 | 1.45 | -0.91 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.22 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 1.53 | -1.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.41 | 7.30 | -6.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCGFX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 | 0.93 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.69 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 | 0.78 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.56 | -0.25 |
Correlation
The correlation between LCGFX and SPY is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
LCGFX vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
LCGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.10%, more than SPY's 1.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCGFX William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund | 10.10% | 8.56% | 5.97% | 0.00% | 0.82% | 4.29% | 3.83% | 6.46% | 17.08% | 0.56% | 1.10% | 9.86% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.14% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
Drawdowns
LCGFX vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCGFX drawdown since its inception was -62.95%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCGFX and SPY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCGFX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.95% | -55.19% | -7.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.59% | -12.05% | -8.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.25% | -24.50% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.25% | -33.72% | -3.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.44% | -6.24% | -14.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.57% | -9.09% | -12.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.62% | 2.52% | +4.10% |
Volatility
LCGFX vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
William Blair Large Cap Growth Fund (LCGFX) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) have volatilities of 5.18% and 5.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LCGFX | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 5.31% | -0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.74% | 9.47% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.13% | 19.05% | +3.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.74% | 17.06% | +4.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.22% | 17.92% | +3.30% |