LCF vs. SPTM
LCF (Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF) and SPTM (SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. LCF is actively managed, while SPTM is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LCF returned 17.79%/yr vs 22.18%/yr for SPTM. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. LCF charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SPTM.
Performance
LCF vs. SPTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly lower than SPTM's 11.85% return.
LCF
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 5.23%
- 6M
- 6.34%
- 1Y
- 22.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.79%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SPTM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 5.19%
- YTD
- 11.85%
- 6M
- 12.28%
- 1Y
- 29.60%
- 3Y*
- 22.18%
- 5Y*
- 13.73%
- 10Y*
- 15.29%
LCF vs. SPTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 5.23% | 17.20% | 20.71% | 26.20% | -5.21% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 11.85% | 16.93% | 23.87% | 25.55% | -6.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between LCF and SPTM is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2022 | 0.95 |
The correlation between LCF and SPTM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
LCF vs. SPTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
LCF
SPTM
Technology
Communication Services
Financial Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Technology
LCF
SPTM
Communication Services
LCF
SPTM
Financial Services
LCF
SPTM
Healthcare
LCF
SPTM
Consumer Cyclical
LCF
SPTM
Industrials
LCF
SPTM
Consumer Defensive
LCF
SPTM
Energy
LCF
SPTM
Real Estate
LCF
SPTM
Basic Materials
LCF
SPTM
Utilities
LCF
-
SPTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LCF vs. SPTM — Risk / Return Rank
LCF
SPTM
LCF vs. SPTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LCF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.91 | 2.51 | -0.59 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.67 | 3.41 | -0.75 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.45 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.96 | 3.48 | -1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.14 | 16.25 | -8.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LCF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.91 | 2.51 | -0.59 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.82 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.46 | +0.60 |
Drawdowns
LCF vs. SPTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum SPTM drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and SPTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LCF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.28% | -54.80% | +36.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.67% | -8.68% | -2.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.28% | -18.87% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.42% | 0.00% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -9.05% | +6.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 1.86% | +0.96% |
Volatility
LCF vs. SPTM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 2.42%, while SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF (SPTM) has a volatility of 2.79%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPTM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LCF | SPTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.42% | 2.79% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 8.90% | +0.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.86% | 11.86% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 16.86% | -1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.47% | 18.04% | -2.57% |
LCF vs. SPTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than SPTM's 0.03% expense ratio.
Dividends
LCF vs. SPTM - Dividend Comparison
LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than SPTM's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCF Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF | 0.52% | 0.55% | 0.63% | 0.71% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPTM SPDR Portfolio S&P 1500 Composite Stock Market ETF | 1.03% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.56% | 1.72% | 1.90% | 1.66% | 1.91% | 1.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, LCF and SPTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SPTM has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to LCF (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs SPTM's -54.80%.
On 3-year performance, SPTM leads with 22.18% vs 17.79% for LCF. On fees, SPTM is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, LCF has been the lower-risk option at 2.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, SPTM has performed better with a 22.18% return vs 17.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPTM is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.
SPTM has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.03% for SPTM.
SPTM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LCF and SPTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer