PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCF vs. BLCR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

LCF vs. BLCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

LCF vs. BLCR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
-7.24%17.20%20.71%14.23%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
-3.06%30.93%17.07%14.18%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a -7.24% return, which is significantly lower than BLCR's -3.06% return.


LCF

1D
2.96%
1M
-5.44%
YTD
-7.24%
6M
-4.68%
1Y
12.52%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
10Y*

BLCR

1D
3.51%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
-3.06%
6M
2.52%
1Y
34.54%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


LCF vs. BLCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than BLCR's 0.36% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

LCF vs. BLCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

BLCR
BLCR Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BLCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BLCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
BLCR Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BLCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
BLCR Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. BLCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCFBLCRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.69

1.64

-0.95

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.11

2.29

-1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.34

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

2.89

-1.79

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.11

12.09

-7.99

LCF vs. BLCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is lower than the BLCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and BLCR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCFBLCRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

1.64

-0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

1.40

-0.55

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and BLCR is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

LCF vs. BLCR - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, more than BLCR's 0.28% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.59%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%
BLCR
Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF
0.28%0.33%0.75%0.13%0.00%

Drawdowns

LCF vs. BLCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, smaller than the maximum BLCR drawdown of -21.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and BLCR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFBLCRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-21.29%

+3.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.77%

-12.13%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.97%

-7.11%

-1.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

-2.28%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.17%

2.90%

+0.27%

Volatility

LCF vs. BLCR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) is 5.34%, while Blackrock Large Cap Core ETF (BLCR) has a volatility of 7.06%. This indicates that LCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


LCFBLCRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.34%

7.06%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.35%

12.45%

-3.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

21.12%

-2.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.62%

17.59%

-1.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

17.59%

-1.97%