PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LCF vs. TSEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LCF vs. TSEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LCF achieves a 5.23% return, which is significantly higher than TSEC's 1.28% return.


LCF

1D
-0.42%
1M
2.89%
YTD
5.23%
6M
6.34%
1Y
22.60%
3Y*
17.79%
5Y*
10Y*

TSEC

1D
0.02%
1M
0.41%
YTD
1.28%
6M
2.05%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LCF vs. TSEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
5.23%17.20%20.71%3.80%
TSEC
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
1.28%7.47%7.62%5.00%

Correlation

The correlation between LCF and TSEC is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 20, 2023

0.09

The correlation between LCF and TSEC shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (all time) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LCF vs. TSEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LCF
LCF Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
LCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LCF Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
LCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
LCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

TSEC
TSEC Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
TSEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
TSEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSEC Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LCF vs. TSEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) and Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LCFTSECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.91

2.23

-0.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.67

3.25

-0.58

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.50

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.96

3.53

-1.57

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.14

11.59

-3.45

LCF vs. TSEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the TSEC Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LCF and TSEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


LCFTSECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.91

2.23

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

2.59

-1.54

Drawdowns

LCF vs. TSEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LCF drawdown since its inception was -18.28%, which is greater than TSEC's maximum drawdown of -1.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LCF and TSEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LCFTSECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-1.78%

-16.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-1.67%

-10.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.31%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-0.33%

-2.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.82%

0.51%

+2.31%

Volatility

LCF vs. TSEC - Volatility Comparison

Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF (LCF) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Touchstone Securitized Income ETF (TSEC) at 0.55%. This indicates that LCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LCFTSECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

0.55%

+1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

2.07%

+6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.86%

2.70%

+9.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.47%

2.90%

+12.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.47%

2.90%

+12.57%

LCF vs. TSEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

LCF has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than TSEC's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

LCF vs. TSEC - Dividend Comparison

LCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than TSEC's 7.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LCF
Touchstone US Large Cap Focused ETF
0.52%0.55%0.63%0.71%0.24%
TSEC
Touchstone Securitized Income ETF
7.30%6.47%5.83%2.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


LCF and TSEC have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LCF has higher volatility (2.42%) compared to TSEC (0.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LCF dropped -18.28% vs TSEC's -1.78%.

On 1-year performance, LCF leads with 22.60% vs 6.00% for TSEC. On fees, TSEC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, TSEC has been the lower-risk option at 0.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, LCF has performed better with a 22.60% return vs 6.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSEC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LCF.

TSEC has the higher dividend yield at 7.30%, compared with 0.52% for LCF.

LCF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while TSEC is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LCF and 0.40% for TSEC.

TSEC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LCF and TSEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer