LBO vs. KBWB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and KBWB (Invesco KBW Bank ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. LBO is actively managed, while KBWB is passively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -13.50% vs 34.45% for KBWB. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for KBWB.

Performance

LBO vs. KBWB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -14.28% return, which is significantly lower than KBWB's 4.07% return.

LBO

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -6.31%
• YTD: -14.28%
• 6M: -13.74%
• 1Y: -13.50%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KBWB

• 1D: -1.39%
• 1M: 2.14%
• YTD: 4.07%
• 6M: 8.58%
• 1Y: 34.45%
• 3Y*: 31.93%
• 5Y*: 7.75%
• 10Y*: 12.09%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBO vs. KBWB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-14.28%	-6.41%	30.93%	7.27%
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	4.07%	32.05%	36.73%	13.35%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and KBWB is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.66

The correlation between LBO and KBWB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

LBO vs. KBWB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LBO	KBWB
Financial Services	96.0%	100.0%
Industrials	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LBO vs. KBWB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 4
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

KBWB

KBWB Risk / Return Rank: 45
KBWB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
KBWB Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
KBWB Omega Ratio Rank: 47
KBWB Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
KBWB Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBO vs. KBWB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LBO	KBWB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.63	1.73	-2.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.75	2.28	-3.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.91	1.30	-0.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.46	2.11	-2.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.95	6.64	-7.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBO vs. KBWB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.63, which is lower than the KBWB Sharpe Ratio of 1.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and KBWB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LBO	KBWB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.63	1.73	-2.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.29	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	0.50	-0.26

Drawdowns

LBO vs. KBWB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, smaller than the maximum KBWB drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and KBWB.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	KBWB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-50.27%	+18.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.19%	-16.38%	-12.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.43%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-49.31%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.64%	-3.29%	-21.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.34%	-11.74%	+3.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.23%	5.20%	+9.03%

Volatility

LBO vs. KBWB - Volatility Comparison

WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Invesco KBW Bank ETF (KBWB) at 5.14%. This indicates that LBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KBWB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	KBWB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	5.14%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.11%	15.49%	+2.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.56%	20.06%	+1.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	26.63%	-5.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	29.20%	-8.00%

LBO vs. KBWB - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than KBWB's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. KBWB - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.95%, more than KBWB's 2.06% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KBWB Invesco KBW Bank ETF	2.06%	2.04%	2.46%	3.20%	3.05%	2.13%	2.62%	2.38%	2.54%	1.35%	1.53%	1.53%
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	7.95%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and KBWB in my portfolio?

LBO and KBWB have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or KBWB?

LBO has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to KBWB (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs KBWB's -50.27%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or KBWB?

On 1-year performance, KBWB leads with 34.45% vs -13.50% for LBO. On fees, KBWB is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, KBWB has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or KBWB?

Over the 1-year period, KBWB has performed better with a 34.45% return vs -13.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or KBWB?

KBWB is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or KBWB?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 7.95%, compared with 2.06% for KBWB.

What is the main difference between LBO and KBWB?

They also come from different issuers: White Wolf and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 0.35% for KBWB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KBWB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.