LBO vs. HGER

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LBO (WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF) and HGER (Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - LBO is a Financials Equities fund actively managed by White Wolf, while HGER is a Commodities fund tracking the Quantix Commodity Index - Benchmark TR Net. LBO is actively managed, while HGER is passively managed. Over the past year, LBO returned -10.24% vs 41.90% for HGER. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LBO charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for HGER.

Performance

LBO vs. HGER - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LBO achieves a -11.35% return, which is significantly lower than HGER's 28.12% return.

LBO

• 1D: -0.70%
• 1M: -3.17%
• YTD: -11.35%
• 6M: -8.83%
• 1Y: -10.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HGER

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -2.72%
• YTD: 28.12%
• 6M: 27.93%
• 1Y: 41.90%
• 3Y*: 21.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LBO vs. HGER - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	-11.35%	-6.41%	30.93%	7.27%
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	28.12%	20.08%	9.25%	-0.95%

Correlation

The correlation between LBO and HGER is -0.11, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023	0.05

The correlation between LBO and HGER shifts across timeframes, from -0.11 (1 year) to 0.05 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

LBO vs. HGER - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LBO	HGER
Financial Services	96.0%	-
Industrials	4.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	102.4%
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LBO vs. HGER — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LBO

LBO Risk / Return Rank: 5
LBO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Omega Ratio Rank: 4
LBO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
LBO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

HGER

HGER Risk / Return Rank: 78
HGER Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
HGER Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
HGER Omega Ratio Rank: 76
HGER Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
HGER Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LBO vs. HGER - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) and Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LBO	HGER	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.48	2.50	-2.98
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.54	3.23	-3.77
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.93	1.46	-0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.37	5.20	-5.57
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.76	17.52	-18.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LBO vs. HGER - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LBO Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the HGER Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LBO and HGER, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LBO	HGER	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48	2.50	-2.98
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.30	0.90	-0.60

Drawdowns

LBO vs. HGER - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LBO drawdown since its inception was -31.40%, which is greater than HGER's maximum drawdown of -23.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LBO and HGER.

Drawdown Indicators

	LBO	HGER	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.40%	-23.31%	-8.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.19%	-8.09%	-21.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-8.84%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.07%	-4.99%	-17.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.31%	-7.66%	-0.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.16%	2.40%	+11.76%

Volatility

LBO vs. HGER - Volatility Comparison

WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF (LBO) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF (HGER) at 4.02%. This indicates that LBO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HGER based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LBO	HGER	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.69%	4.02%	+0.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.81%	14.54%	+3.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.31%	16.87%	+4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.11%	17.62%	+3.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.11%	17.62%	+3.49%

LBO vs. HGER - Expense Ratio Comparison

LBO has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than HGER's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

LBO vs. HGER - Dividend Comparison

LBO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.69%, more than HGER's 5.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
HGER Harbor Commodity All-Weather Strategy ETF	5.53%	7.09%	3.28%	7.24%	0.64%
LBO WHITEWOLF Publicly Listed Private Equity ETF	7.69%	7.04%	5.79%	1.20%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LBO and HGER in my portfolio?

LBO and HGER have a correlation of -0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LBO or HGER?

LBO has higher volatility (4.69%) compared to HGER (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LBO dropped -31.40% vs HGER's -23.31%.

Which ETF is better, LBO or HGER?

On 1-year performance, HGER leads with 41.90% vs -10.24% for LBO. On fees, HGER is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, HGER has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LBO or HGER?

Over the 1-year period, HGER has performed better with a 41.90% return vs -10.24%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LBO or HGER?

HGER is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LBO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LBO or HGER?

LBO has the higher dividend yield at 7.69%, compared with 5.53% for HGER.

What is the main difference between LBO and HGER?

LBO is categorized as Financials Equities, while HGER is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: White Wolf and Harbor. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for LBO and 0.68% for HGER.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HGER currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.