LB vs. VNOM
LB (LandBridge Company LLC) and VNOM (Viper Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — LB in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, VNOM in Oil & Gas E&P. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LB vs. VNOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LB achieves a 53.71% return, which is significantly higher than VNOM's 16.06% return.
LB
- 1D
- -3.17%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 38.67%
- YTD
- 53.71%
- 1Y
- 36.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 93.55%
VNOM
- 1D
- -2.06%
- 1M
- 7.21%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- YTD
- 16.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $16.31M | $19.04M | $25.06M | |
| $60.34M | $65.20M | $76.83M |
LB vs. VNOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
LB LandBridge Company LLC | 53.71% | -6.35% |
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc. | 16.06% | 5.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between LB and VNOM is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025 | 0.45 |
Fundamentals
LB:
$5.78B
VNOM:
$15.73B
LB:
$1.08
VNOM:
-$0.28
LB:
13.93
VNOM:
4.55
LB:
$206.15M
VNOM:
$1.60B
LB:
$142.47M
VNOM:
$740.00M
LB:
$141.85M
VNOM:
$1.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LB vs. VNOM — Risk / Return Rank
LB
VNOM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LB vs. VNOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LandBridge Company LLC (LB) and Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LB | VNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.69 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LB vs. VNOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LB drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, which is greater than VNOM's maximum drawdown of -19.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB and VNOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LB | VNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.25% | -19.42% | -28.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.25% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.84% | -13.03% | +1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.74% | -6.03% | -12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.66% | — | — |
Volatility
LB vs. VNOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LB | VNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.00% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.79% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 62.27% | 28.67% | +33.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 68.74% | 28.67% | +40.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 68.74% | 28.67% | +40.07% |
Dividends
LB vs. VNOM - Dividend Comparison
LB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than VNOM's 4.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
LB LandBridge Company LLC | 0.59% | 0.82% | 0.15% |
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc. | 4.07% | 1.50% | 0.00% |
Financials
LB vs. VNOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LandBridge Company LLC and Viper Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LB vs. VNOM - Profitability Comparison
LB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LandBridge Company LLC reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 51.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
VNOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Viper Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 255.00M and revenue of 496.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.
LB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LandBridge Company LLC reported an operating income of 29.18M and revenue of 51.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 57.2%.
VNOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Viper Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 238.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.
LB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, LandBridge Company LLC reported a net income of 17.87M and revenue of 51.01M, resulting in a net margin of 35.0%.
VNOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Viper Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 97.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LB and VNOM have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LB and VNOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer