LB vs. KRP
Compare and contrast key facts about LandBridge Company LLC (LB) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP).
Performance
LB vs. KRP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LB vs. KRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
LB LandBridge Company LLC | 41.17% | -23.67% | 179.45% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 26.23% | -18.60% | 4.57% |
Fundamentals
LB:
$5.28B
KRP:
$1.71B
LB:
$0.32
KRP:
$0.47
LB:
217.24
KRP:
30.92
LB:
29.52
KRP:
5.19
LB:
19.43
KRP:
3.21
LB:
$178.81M
KRP:
$333.83M
LB:
$165.68M
KRP:
$313.39M
LB:
$112.73M
KRP:
$225.70M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LB achieves a 41.17% return, which is significantly higher than KRP's 26.23% return.
LB
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -7.17%
- YTD
- 41.17%
- 6M
- 29.85%
- 1Y
- -3.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KRP
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 26.23%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LB vs. KRP — Risk / Return Rank
LB
KRP
LB vs. KRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LandBridge Company LLC (LB) and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LB | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | 0.56 | -0.62 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.38 | 0.93 | -0.55 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.12 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.01 | 0.74 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.01 | 1.65 | -1.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LB | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 | 0.56 | -0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.27 | 0.15 | +1.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between LB and KRP is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LB vs. KRP - Dividend Comparison
LB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than KRP's 10.85% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LB LandBridge Company LLC | 0.61% | 0.82% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.85% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% |
Drawdowns
LB vs. KRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LB drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, smaller than the maximum KRP drawdown of -80.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB and KRP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LB | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.25% | -80.91% | +32.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.25% | -20.50% | -27.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.02% | -2.49% | -16.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.14% | -19.78% | +0.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 28.26% | 9.19% | +19.07% |
Volatility
LB vs. KRP - Volatility Comparison
LandBridge Company LLC (LB) has a higher volatility of 16.39% compared to Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) at 5.61%. This indicates that LB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LB | KRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.39% | 5.61% | +10.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 48.60% | 15.86% | +32.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 63.74% | 28.13% | +35.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 69.39% | 28.52% | +40.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.39% | 41.32% | +28.07% |
Financials
LB vs. KRP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between LandBridge Company LLC and Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities