PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LB vs. TLTW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

LB vs. TLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in LandBridge Company LLC (LB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LB achieves a 30.91% return, which is significantly higher than TLTW's 2.36% return.


LB

1D
2.58%
1M
-18.57%
YTD
30.91%
6M
21.10%
1Y
-3.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TLTW

1D
0.18%
1M
2.22%
YTD
2.36%
6M
2.13%
1Y
9.03%
3Y*
0.58%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LB vs. TLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
LB
LandBridge Company LLC
30.91%-23.67%240.48%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
2.36%11.36%-1.65%

Correlation

The correlation between LB and TLTW is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2024

-0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LB vs. TLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LB
LB Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
LB Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
LB Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

TLTW
TLTW Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LB vs. TLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for LandBridge Company LLC (LB) and iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LBTLTWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.21

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

1.52

-1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.17

4.36

-4.53

LB vs. TLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LB Sharpe Ratio is -0.07, which is lower than the TLTW Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LB and TLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LB vs. TLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LB drawdown since its inception was -48.25%, which is greater than TLTW's maximum drawdown of -18.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB and TLTW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LBTLTWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.25%

-18.61%

-29.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-48.25%

-5.97%

-42.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-24.91%

-2.10%

-22.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.12%

-8.17%

-10.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

23.95%

2.08%

+21.87%

Volatility

LB vs. TLTW - Volatility Comparison

LandBridge Company LLC (LB) has a higher volatility of 15.80% compared to iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF (TLTW) at 1.66%. This indicates that LB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LBTLTWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.80%

1.66%

+14.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.83%

5.80%

+34.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.30%

7.62%

+52.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

69.09%

11.33%

+57.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.09%

11.33%

+57.76%

Dividends

LB vs. TLTW - Dividend Comparison

LB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.69%, less than TLTW's 11.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
LB
LandBridge Company LLC
0.69%0.82%0.15%0.00%0.00%
TLTW
iShares 20+ Year Treasury Bond BuyWrite Strategy ETF
11.62%14.82%14.47%19.59%8.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


LB and TLTW have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LB has higher volatility (15.80%) compared to TLTW (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LB dropped -48.25% vs TLTW's -18.61%.

TLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LB and TLTW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer