PortfoliosLab logo
KRP vs. BSM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between KRP and BSM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

KRP vs. BSM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

KRP:

-0.15

BSM:

-0.05

Sortino Ratio

KRP:

-0.12

BSM:

-0.18

Omega Ratio

KRP:

0.98

BSM:

0.98

Calmar Ratio

KRP:

-0.23

BSM:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

KRP:

-0.66

BSM:

-0.94

Ulcer Index

KRP:

9.42%

BSM:

5.56%

Daily Std Dev

KRP:

27.46%

BSM:

22.39%

Max Drawdown

KRP:

-80.91%

BSM:

-75.58%

Current Drawdown

KRP:

-12.75%

BSM:

-8.79%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KRP:

$1.47B

BSM:

$2.94B

EPS

KRP:

-$0.12

BSM:

$0.92

PEG Ratio

KRP:

0.00

BSM:

1.22

PS Ratio

KRP:

4.71

BSM:

7.73

PB Ratio

KRP:

1.39

BSM:

2.76

Total Revenue (TTM)

KRP:

$322.53M

BSM:

$437.90M

Gross Profit (TTM)

KRP:

$207.36M

BSM:

$335.83M

EBITDA (TTM)

KRP:

$149.18M

BSM:

$269.93M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KRP achieves a -11.57% return, which is significantly lower than BSM's 0.68% return.


KRP

YTD

-11.57%

1M

15.58%

6M

-10.02%

1Y

-4.13%

5Y*

30.89%

10Y*

N/A

BSM

YTD

0.68%

1M

2.32%

6M

-2.40%

1Y

-1.09%

5Y*

30.22%

10Y*

7.00%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

KRP vs. BSM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KRP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of KRP is 3636
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of KRP is 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of KRP is 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of KRP is 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of KRP is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of KRP is 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BSM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BSM is 3333
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BSM is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BSM is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BSM is 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BSM is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BSM is 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

KRP vs. BSM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current KRP Sharpe Ratio is -0.15, which is lower than the BSM Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KRP and BSM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

KRP vs. BSM - Dividend Comparison

KRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.82%, less than BSM's 10.76% yield.


TTM2024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KRP
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP
8.82%10.78%11.50%11.26%8.36%11.00%9.29%12.22%5.17%0.00%0.00%
BSM
Black Stone Minerals, L.P.
10.76%10.96%11.90%9.13%7.74%10.18%11.64%8.61%6.69%5.86%2.94%

Drawdowns

KRP vs. BSM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KRP drawdown since its inception was -80.91%, which is greater than BSM's maximum drawdown of -75.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRP and BSM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

KRP vs. BSM - Volatility Comparison

Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) has a higher volatility of 12.37% compared to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) at 7.28%. This indicates that KRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

KRP vs. BSM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and Black Stone Minerals, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M20212022202320242025
90.26M
115.25M
(KRP) Total Revenue
(BSM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

KRP vs. BSM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
59.6%
81.4%
(KRP) Gross Margin
(BSM) Gross Margin
KRP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 53.77M and revenue of 90.26M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 59.6%.

BSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported a gross profit of 93.78M and revenue of 115.25M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.4%.

KRP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported an operating income of 33.58M and revenue of 90.26M, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.

BSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported an operating income of 17.16M and revenue of 115.25M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.9%.

KRP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a net income of 23.06M and revenue of 90.26M, resulting in a net margin of 25.6%.

BSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Black Stone Minerals, L.P. reported a net income of 15.95M and revenue of 115.25M, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.