KRP vs. BSM
Compare and contrast key facts about Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM).
Performance
KRP vs. BSM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KRP vs. BSM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 26.23% | -18.60% | 20.43% | 0.76% | 36.93% | 89.97% | -48.94% | 38.62% | -8.93% | -17.25% |
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 16.05% | 0.56% | 1.47% | 5.85% | 80.82% | 67.42% | -42.97% | -9.53% | -7.04% | 2.49% |
Fundamentals
KRP:
$1.71B
BSM:
$3.21B
KRP:
$0.47
BSM:
$1.38
KRP:
30.92
BSM:
10.93
KRP:
0.12
BSM:
0.31
KRP:
5.19
BSM:
8.30
KRP:
3.21
BSM:
3.87
KRP:
$333.83M
BSM:
$395.04M
KRP:
$313.39M
BSM:
$296.51M
KRP:
$225.70M
BSM:
$323.06M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRP achieves a 26.23% return, which is significantly higher than BSM's 16.05% return.
KRP
- 1D
- -2.49%
- 1M
- 3.52%
- YTD
- 26.23%
- 6M
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 15.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.89%
- 5Y*
- 19.73%
- 10Y*
- —
BSM
- 1D
- -0.92%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 16.05%
- 6M
- 20.08%
- 1Y
- 8.82%
- 3Y*
- 9.41%
- 5Y*
- 22.22%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRP vs. BSM — Risk / Return Rank
KRP
BSM
KRP vs. BSM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KRP | BSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.56 | 0.38 | +0.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 0.67 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.08 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 0.46 | +0.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.65 | 0.93 | +0.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KRP | BSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 | 0.38 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.84 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.33 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.15 | 0.22 | -0.07 |
Correlation
The correlation between KRP and BSM is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
KRP vs. BSM - Dividend Comparison
KRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.85%, more than BSM's 8.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.85% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSM Black Stone Minerals, L.P. | 8.43% | 10.16% | 10.96% | 11.90% | 9.13% | 8.23% | 10.18% | 11.64% | 8.61% | 6.69% | 5.86% | 2.94% |
Drawdowns
KRP vs. BSM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRP drawdown since its inception was -80.91%, which is greater than BSM's maximum drawdown of -75.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRP and BSM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRP | BSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.91% | -75.58% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.50% | -19.66% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -25.52% | -2.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.58% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.49% | -2.07% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -16.53% | -3.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.19% | 9.76% | -0.57% |
Volatility
KRP vs. BSM - Volatility Comparison
Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to Black Stone Minerals, L.P. (BSM) at 5.26%. This indicates that KRP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KRP | BSM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 5.26% | +0.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.86% | 14.40% | +1.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.13% | 23.57% | +4.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.52% | 26.82% | +1.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.32% | 31.68% | +9.64% |
Financials
KRP vs. BSM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and Black Stone Minerals, L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities