KRP vs. VNOM
KRP (Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP) and VNOM (Viper Energy, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Oil & Gas E&P industry within the Energy sector. Over the past 5 years, KRP returned 17.06%/yr vs 27.71%/yr for VNOM. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
KRP vs. VNOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KRP achieves a 34.14% return, which is significantly higher than VNOM's 18.51% return.
KRP
- 1D
- 1.42%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 17.46%
- YTD
- 34.14%
- 1Y
- 12.88%
- 3Y*
- 10.16%
- 5Y*
- 17.06%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.14%
VNOM
- 1D
- 2.65%
- 1M
- 9.47%
- 6M
- 8.12%
- YTD
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 28.80%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- 27.71%
- 10Y*
- 17.97%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $9.05M | $8.25M | $11.35M | |
| $59.51M | $65.89M | $77.95M |
KRP vs. VNOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 34.14% | -18.60% | 20.43% | 0.76% | 36.93% | 89.97% | -48.94% | 38.62% | -8.93% | -5.43% |
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc. | 18.51% | -16.58% | 65.52% | 4.83% | 61.69% | 94.24% | -50.69% | 0.66% | 19.60% | 46.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between KRP and VNOM is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.59 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.47 |
Over the past year, KRP and VNOM have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.47, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KRP:
$1.48B
VNOM:
$16.06B
KRP:
$0.61
VNOM:
-$0.28
KRP:
5.74
VNOM:
4.64
KRP:
3.42
VNOM:
1.58
KRP:
$309.11M
VNOM:
$1.60B
KRP:
$319.28M
VNOM:
$740.00M
KRP:
$177.16M
VNOM:
$1.04B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KRP vs. VNOM — Risk / Return Rank
KRP
VNOM
KRP vs. VNOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) and Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KRP | VNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.16 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.61 | 1.30 | -0.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.61 | 3.42 | -1.81 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KRP vs. VNOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KRP drawdown since its inception was -80.91%, smaller than the maximum VNOM drawdown of -86.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KRP and VNOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KRP | VNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.91% | -86.96% | +6.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.43% | -19.42% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.58% | -34.46% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.58% | -34.46% | +6.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | -14.22% | +10.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.19% | -31.48% | +12.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 7.38% | +0.01% |
Volatility
KRP vs. VNOM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP (KRP) is 5.90%, while Viper Energy, Inc. (VNOM) has a volatility of 9.38%. This indicates that KRP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KRP | VNOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.90% | 9.38% | -3.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.47% | 19.98% | -3.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.12% | 28.54% | -5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.35% | 35.63% | -7.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.10% | 45.06% | -3.96% |
Dividends
KRP vs. VNOM - Dividend Comparison
KRP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.09%, more than VNOM's 5.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KRP Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP | 10.09% | 13.61% | 10.78% | 11.50% | 11.26% | 8.36% | 11.00% | 9.29% | 12.22% | 5.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VNOM Viper Energy, Inc. | 5.18% | 6.03% | 4.89% | 5.58% | 7.68% | 5.16% | 5.85% | 7.38% | 8.14% | 5.27% | 4.83% | 6.16% |
Financials
KRP vs. VNOM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP and Viper Energy, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
KRP vs. VNOM - Profitability Comparison
KRP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a gross profit of 59.66M and revenue of 65.54M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 91.0%.
VNOM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Viper Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 255.00M and revenue of 496.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.4%.
KRP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported an operating income of 15.80M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in an operating margin of 24.1%.
VNOM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Viper Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 238.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 48.0%.
KRP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Kimbell Royalty Partners, LP reported a net income of 3.97M and revenue of 65.54M, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.
VNOM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Viper Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 97.00M and revenue of 496.00M, resulting in a net margin of 19.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
KRP and VNOM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNOM has higher volatility (9.38%) compared to KRP (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KRP dropped -80.91% vs VNOM's -86.96%.
VNOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.89 vs 0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KRP and VNOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer