LB.TO vs. ^TNX
LB.TO (Laurentian Bank of Canada) is a stock, while ^TNX (Treasury Yield 10 Years) is an index. Over the past 10 years, LB.TO returned 2.91%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for ^TNX. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
LB.TO vs. ^TNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
LB.TO is traded in CAD, while ^TNX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ^TNX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LB.TO achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly lower than ^TNX's 9.01% return. Over the past 10 years, LB.TO has underperformed ^TNX with an annualized return of 2.91%, while ^TNX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.92% annualized return.
LB.TO
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -0.00%
- YTD
- 2.37%
- 6M
- 3.50%
- 1Y
- 42.16%
- 3Y*
- 15.01%
- 5Y*
- 3.82%
- 10Y*
- 2.91%
^TNX
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 8.90%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- 27.02%
- 10Y*
- 10.92%
LB.TO vs. ^TNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LB.TO Laurentian Bank of Canada | 2.37% | 48.25% | 11.70% | -9.82% | -15.45% | 33.94% | -25.22% | 23.86% | -28.54% | 2.23% |
^TNX Treasury Yield 10 Years | 9.01% | -13.14% | 28.45% | -2.53% | 174.83% | 63.40% | -53.02% | -32.07% | 21.16% | -7.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between LB.TO and ^TNX is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2009 | 0.14 |
The correlation between LB.TO and ^TNX shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (3 years) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LB.TO vs. ^TNX — Risk / Return Rank
LB.TO
^TNX
LB.TO vs. ^TNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LB.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +5.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.92 | 1.05 | +0.86 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.78 | 0.35 | +10.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.19 | 0.69 | +35.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LB.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.97 | 0.26 | +1.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 | 0.81 | -0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 | 0.23 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.05 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
LB.TO vs. ^TNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LB.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, smaller than the maximum ^TNX drawdown of -83.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB.TO and ^TNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LB.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -83.97% | +27.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.87% | -12.47% | +8.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.38% | -28.10% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.38% | -28.10% | -13.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.49% | -83.93% | +34.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -9.83% | +9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.92% | -32.53% | +14.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 6.24% | -5.09% |
Volatility
LB.TO vs. ^TNX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) is 0.71%, while Treasury Yield 10 Years (^TNX) has a volatility of 5.34%. This indicates that LB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^TNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LB.TO | ^TNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.71% | 5.34% | -4.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.95% | 11.64% | -9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 17.05% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.44% | 33.37% | -6.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.04% | 48.25% | -22.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LB.TO and ^TNX have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for LB.TO and ^TNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer