PortfoliosLab logo
LB.TO vs. RY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LB.TO and RY is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LB.TO vs. RY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LB.TO:

1.45

RY:

1.20

Sortino Ratio

LB.TO:

1.57

RY:

1.71

Omega Ratio

LB.TO:

1.21

RY:

1.23

Calmar Ratio

LB.TO:

0.53

RY:

1.49

Martin Ratio

LB.TO:

3.85

RY:

4.22

Ulcer Index

LB.TO:

5.80%

RY:

5.16%

Daily Std Dev

LB.TO:

21.33%

RY:

18.04%

Max Drawdown

LB.TO:

-59.10%

RY:

-63.05%

Current Drawdown

LB.TO:

-23.01%

RY:

-1.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LB.TO:

CA$1.35B

RY:

$179.94B

EPS

LB.TO:

CA$3.00

RY:

$9.15

PE Ratio

LB.TO:

10.12

RY:

13.93

PEG Ratio

LB.TO:

1.85

RY:

2.38

PS Ratio

LB.TO:

1.44

RY:

3.09

PB Ratio

LB.TO:

0.52

RY:

2.03

Total Revenue (TTM)

LB.TO:

CA$742.08M

RY:

$62.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LB.TO:

CA$197.08M

RY:

$46.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

LB.TO:

CA$54.13M

RY:

$14.16B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LB.TO achieves a 8.40% return, which is significantly higher than RY's 7.65% return. Over the past 10 years, LB.TO has underperformed RY with an annualized return of 0.69%, while RY has yielded a comparatively higher 11.44% annualized return.


LB.TO

YTD

8.40%

1M

11.38%

6M

5.89%

1Y

30.84%

3Y*

-4.03%

5Y*

5.49%

10Y*

0.69%

RY

YTD

7.65%

1M

5.13%

6M

4.00%

1Y

21.57%

3Y*

11.08%

5Y*

17.08%

10Y*

11.44%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Laurentian Bank of Canada

Royal Bank of Canada

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

LB.TO vs. RY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LB.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LB.TO is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LB.TO is 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LB.TO is 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LB.TO is 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LB.TO is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LB.TO is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

RY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RY is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RY is 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RY is 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RY is 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RY is 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RY is 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LB.TO vs. RY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and Royal Bank of Canada (RY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LB.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the RY Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LB.TO and RY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

LB.TO vs. RY - Dividend Comparison

LB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, more than RY's 3.24% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LB.TO
Laurentian Bank of Canada
6.52%6.84%5.02%5.57%4.08%5.99%5.94%6.72%4.39%4.14%5.57%4.18%
RY
Royal Bank of Canada
3.24%3.39%3.93%4.12%3.28%3.86%3.88%4.29%3.28%3.59%4.54%3.73%

Drawdowns

LB.TO vs. RY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LB.TO drawdown since its inception was -59.10%, smaller than the maximum RY drawdown of -63.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB.TO and RY.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

LB.TO vs. RY - Volatility Comparison

Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Royal Bank of Canada (RY) at 4.74%. This indicates that LB.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LB.TO vs. RY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laurentian Bank of Canada and Royal Bank of Canada. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20212022202320242025
248.76M
15.66B
(LB.TO) Total Revenue
(RY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. LB.TO values in CAD, RY values in USD