LB.TO vs. BNS.TO
Compare and contrast key facts about Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO).
Performance
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LB.TO Laurentian Bank of Canada | 0.45% | 48.25% | 11.70% | -9.82% | -15.45% | 33.94% | -25.22% | 23.86% | -28.54% | 2.23% |
BNS.TO The Bank of Nova Scotia | -2.74% | 38.75% | 27.51% | 3.68% | -22.84% | 37.98% | -0.30% | 11.80% | -12.26% | 12.80% |
Fundamentals
LB.TO:
CA$1.79B
BNS.TO:
CA$128.67B
LB.TO:
CA$1.82
BNS.TO:
CA$7.07
LB.TO:
22.00
BNS.TO:
13.77
LB.TO:
0.82
BNS.TO:
2.27
LB.TO:
0.69
BNS.TO:
1.66
LB.TO:
CA$2.17B
BNS.TO:
CA$54.25B
LB.TO:
CA$778.78M
BNS.TO:
CA$28.61B
LB.TO:
CA$132.48M
BNS.TO:
CA$12.85B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LB.TO achieves a 0.45% return, which is significantly higher than BNS.TO's -2.74% return. Over the past 10 years, LB.TO has underperformed BNS.TO with an annualized return of 3.75%, while BNS.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 9.93% annualized return.
LB.TO
- 1D
- -1.19%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- 0.45%
- 6M
- 23.80%
- 1Y
- 55.29%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.56%
- 10Y*
- 3.75%
BNS.TO
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -5.78%
- YTD
- -2.74%
- 6M
- 10.64%
- 1Y
- 50.74%
- 3Y*
- 19.62%
- 5Y*
- 10.30%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO — Risk / Return Rank
LB.TO
BNS.TO
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) and The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LB.TO | BNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.37 | 3.26 | -0.89 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.54 | 4.30 | +1.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.85 | 1.68 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 9.33 | 4.40 | +4.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 39.18 | 17.10 | +22.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LB.TO | BNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.37 | 3.26 | -0.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.64 | -0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 | 0.53 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.28 | 0.63 | -0.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between LB.TO and BNS.TO is 0.34, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Dividend Comparison
LB.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than BNS.TO's 3.39% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LB.TO Laurentian Bank of Canada | 3.52% | 4.67% | 6.84% | 5.02% | 5.57% | 4.08% | 5.99% | 5.94% | 6.72% | 4.39% | 4.14% | 5.57% |
BNS.TO The Bank of Nova Scotia | 3.39% | 4.27% | 5.49% | 6.48% | 4.61% | 5.14% | 5.23% | 3.60% | 4.91% | 3.82% | 3.91% | 6.11% |
Drawdowns
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LB.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.22%, which is greater than BNS.TO's maximum drawdown of -52.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LB.TO and BNS.TO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LB.TO | BNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.22% | -52.27% | -3.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.65% | -11.48% | +6.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.38% | -34.87% | -6.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.49% | -38.95% | -10.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.19% | -7.90% | +6.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.01% | -8.83% | -9.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.42% | 2.96% | -1.54% |
Volatility
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Laurentian Bank of Canada (LB.TO) is 1.68%, while The Bank of Nova Scotia (BNS.TO) has a volatility of 6.17%. This indicates that LB.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNS.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LB.TO | BNS.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.68% | 6.17% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.89% | 10.64% | +7.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.42% | 15.64% | +7.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.67% | 16.08% | +10.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.13% | 18.76% | +7.37% |
Financials
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Laurentian Bank of Canada and The Bank of Nova Scotia. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LB.TO vs. BNS.TO - Profitability Comparison
LB.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Laurentian Bank of Canada reported a gross profit of 90.60M and revenue of 428.66M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
BNS.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a gross profit of 4.17B and revenue of 9.65B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.2%.
LB.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Laurentian Bank of Canada reported an operating income of -32.32M and revenue of 428.66M, resulting in an operating margin of -7.5%.
BNS.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 9.65B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.9%.
LB.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Laurentian Bank of Canada reported a net income of -20.50M and revenue of 428.66M, resulting in a net margin of -4.8%.
BNS.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Bank of Nova Scotia reported a net income of 2.30B and revenue of 9.65B, resulting in a net margin of 23.8%.