LAR.TO vs. ALB
Compare and contrast key facts about Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB).
Performance
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAR.TO Lithium Argentina AG
| 21.41% | 102.65% | -54.73% | -19.20% | -30.28% | 130.41% | 284.14% | -3.48% | -61.45% | 179.47% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 28.96% | 60.03% | -34.30% | -34.28% | 0.03% | 58.31% | 101.91% | -8.04% | -33.71% | 40.65% |
Different Trading Currencies
LAR.TO is traded in CAD, while ALB is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ALB values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Fundamentals
LAR.TO:
CA$0.00
ALB:
$5.14B
LAR.TO:
-CA$1.16M
ALB:
$668.72M
LAR.TO:
CA$14.36M
ALB:
$221.01M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAR.TO achieves a 21.41% return, which is significantly lower than ALB's 28.96% return. Over the past 10 years, LAR.TO has outperformed ALB with an annualized return of 24.42%, while ALB has yielded a comparatively lower 12.91% annualized return.
LAR.TO
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -15.61%
- YTD
- 21.41%
- 6M
- 100.43%
- 1Y
- 203.92%
- 3Y*
- -7.72%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 24.42%
ALB
- 1D
- 1.19%
- 1M
- 2.72%
- YTD
- 28.96%
- 6M
- 122.44%
- 1Y
- 145.20%
- 3Y*
- -4.38%
- 5Y*
- 6.97%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAR.TO vs. ALB — Risk / Return Rank
LAR.TO
ALB
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Albemarle Corporation (ALB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAR.TO | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.47 | 2.29 | +0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.06 | 2.57 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.18 | 4.84 | +1.34 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.29 | 11.12 | +4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAR.TO | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.47 | 2.29 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.04 | 0.13 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.28 | +0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.37 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between LAR.TO and ALB is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Dividend Comparison
LAR.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ALB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAR.TO Lithium Argentina AG
| 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ALB Albemarle Corporation | 0.90% | 1.15% | 1.87% | 1.11% | 0.73% | 0.67% | 1.04% | 2.01% | 1.74% | 1.00% | 1.42% | 2.07% |
Drawdowns
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAR.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.78%, which is greater than ALB's maximum drawdown of -82.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAR.TO and ALB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAR.TO | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -94.78% | -83.90% | -10.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -32.65% | -29.74% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.58% | -83.90% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -88.58% | -83.90% | -4.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -55.75% | -42.07% | -13.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.84% | -20.55% | -39.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.21% | 12.09% | +1.12% |
Volatility
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Volatility Comparison
Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) has a higher volatility of 28.10% compared to Albemarle Corporation (ALB) at 16.30%. This indicates that LAR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LAR.TO | ALB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 28.10% | 16.30% | +11.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.25% | 43.11% | +20.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.17% | 63.78% | +19.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.18% | 52.05% | +18.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 79.44% | 46.00% | +33.44% |
Financials
LAR.TO vs. ALB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Argentina AG and Albemarle Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities