LAR.TO vs. LAC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC).

Performance

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
LAR.TO Lithium Argentina AG	21.41%	102.65%	-54.73%	-5.46%
LAC Lithium Americas Corp.	-8.18%	40.07%	-49.61%	-38.82%

Different Trading Currencies

LAR.TO is traded in CAD, while LAC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the LAC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Fundamentals

Total Revenue (TTM) LAR.TO : CA$0.00 LAC : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) LAR.TO : -CA$1.16M LAC : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) LAR.TO : CA$14.36M LAC : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAR.TO achieves a 21.41% return, which is significantly higher than LAC's -8.18% return.

LAR.TO

• 1D: 0.98%
• 1M: -15.61%
• YTD: 21.41%
• 6M: 100.43%
• 1Y: 203.92%
• 3Y*: -7.72%
• 5Y*: 3.00%
• 10Y*: 24.42%

LAC

• 1D: 4.11%
• 1M: -20.40%
• YTD: -8.18%
• 6M: -30.89%
• 1Y: 40.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

LAR.TO vs. LAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAR.TO

LAR.TO Risk / Return Rank: 93
LAR.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LAR.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
LAR.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 88
LAR.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LAR.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 94

LAC

LAC Risk / Return Rank: 64
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 59
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) and Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LAR.TO	LAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	0.32	+2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	1.84	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.21	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.18	0.66	+5.53
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.29	1.19	+14.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAR.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is higher than the LAC Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAR.TO and LAC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LAR.TO	LAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	0.32	+2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.10	-0.30	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between LAR.TO and LAC is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAR.TO nor LAC has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAR.TO drawdown since its inception was -94.78%, which is greater than LAC's maximum drawdown of -81.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAR.TO and LAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAR.TO	LAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.78%	-81.83%	-12.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.65%	-63.08%	+30.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-88.58%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-55.75%	-66.30%	+10.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.84%	-63.63%	+3.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.21%	34.87%	-21.66%

Volatility

LAR.TO vs. LAC - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Argentina AG (LAR.TO) has a higher volatility of 28.10% compared to Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) at 17.15%. This indicates that LAR.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAR.TO	LAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	28.10%	17.15%	+10.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	63.25%	68.78%	-5.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.17%	130.30%	-47.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.18%	102.22%	-32.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	79.44%	102.22%	-22.78%

Financials