LAND vs. SGOL

Last updated Jul 25, 2026

LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) is a stock, while SGOL (abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price PM ($/ozt). Over the past 10 years, LAND returned 1.32%/yr vs 11.62%/yr for SGOL. Their 0.08 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

LAND vs. SGOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly higher than SGOL's -6.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed SGOL with an annualized return of 1.32%, while SGOL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.62% annualized return.

LAND

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.84%
• 6M: -8.77%
• YTD: -3.62%
• 1Y: -7.01%
• 3Y*: -16.85%
• 5Y*: -15.15%
• 10Y*: 1.32%
• ALL TIME*: 0.18%

SGOL

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.65%
• 6M: -18.71%
• YTD: -6.06%
• 1Y: 21.20%
• 3Y*: 27.11%
• 5Y*: 17.42%
• 10Y*: 11.62%
• ALL TIME*: 8.34%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation	$4.89M	$5.73M	$5.80M
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF	$79.87M	$79.24M	$102.39M

LAND vs. SGOL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation	-3.62%	-10.69%	-21.63%	-18.49%	-44.42%	136.25%	17.35%	18.07%	-10.82%	24.66%
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF	-6.06%	63.99%	26.90%	12.99%	-0.51%	-3.94%	25.03%	18.21%	-1.94%	12.86%

Correlation

The correlation between LAND and SGOL is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.16
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.14
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.11
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013	0.08

Return for Risk

LAND vs. SGOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAND

LAND Risk / Return Rank: 23
LAND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
LAND Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
LAND Omega Ratio Rank: 22
LAND Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
LAND Martin Ratio Rank: 23

SGOL

SGOL Risk / Return Rank: 28
SGOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
SGOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
SGOL Omega Ratio Rank: 33
SGOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
SGOL Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAND vs. SGOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	LAND	SGOL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.55	0.73	-1.28
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.65	1.07	-1.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	1.15	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.52	0.77	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.07	1.73	-2.79

LAND vs. SGOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAND Sharpe Ratio is -0.55, which is lower than the SGOL Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAND and SGOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

LAND vs. SGOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, which is greater than SGOL's maximum drawdown of -45.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and SGOL.

Drawdown Indicators

	LAND	SGOL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-76.45%	-45.51%	-30.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.74%	-26.32%	-4.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-43.87%	-26.32%	-17.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-76.45%	-26.32%	-50.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-76.45%	-26.32%	-50.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-75.36%	-24.94%	-50.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-31.08%	-18.45%	-12.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	17.36%	11.64%	+5.72%

Volatility

LAND vs. SGOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is 5.65%, while abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF (SGOL) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that LAND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LAND	SGOL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.65%	6.07%	-0.42%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.32%	23.69%	-1.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.03%	27.79%	+1.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.31%	18.34%	+12.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.96%	16.08%	+13.88%

Dividends

LAND vs. SGOL - Dividend Comparison

LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while SGOL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation	6.57%	6.12%	5.16%	3.83%	2.98%	1.60%	3.67%	4.12%	4.63%	3.90%	4.40%	5.38%
SGOL abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LAND and SGOL in my portfolio?

LAND and SGOL have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LAND or SGOL?

SGOL has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to LAND (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.45% vs SGOL's -45.51%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SGOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.