PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
LAND vs. GOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


LANDGOOD
YTD Return-7.52%39.43%
1Y Return-1.26%58.72%
3Y Return (Ann)-17.17%-0.90%
5Y Return (Ann)4.64%2.70%
10Y Return (Ann)5.79%7.98%
Sharpe Ratio-0.112.32
Sortino Ratio0.023.23
Omega Ratio1.001.40
Calmar Ratio-0.041.18
Martin Ratio-0.3014.37
Ulcer Index8.45%3.84%
Daily Std Dev24.01%23.80%
Max Drawdown-68.33%-67.22%
Current Drawdown-66.23%-15.29%

Fundamentals


LANDGOOD
Market Cap$467.14M$762.96M
EPS-$0.25$0.21
PEG Ratio22.95-62.67
Total Revenue (TTM)$88.57M$147.92M
Gross Profit (TTM)$40.61M$91.58M
EBITDA (TTM)$59.66M$93.11M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between LAND and GOOD is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

LAND vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -7.52% return, which is significantly lower than GOOD's 39.43% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 5.79%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 7.98% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-1.61%
21.30%
LAND
GOOD

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAND vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


LAND
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for LAND, currently valued at -0.11, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.11
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for LAND, currently valued at 0.02, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.02
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for LAND, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for LAND, currently valued at -0.04, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.04
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for LAND, currently valued at -0.30, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.30
GOOD
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 2.32, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.32
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 3.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.003.23
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.40
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.18
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GOOD, currently valued at 14.37, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.0014.37

LAND vs. GOOD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAND Sharpe Ratio is -0.11, which is lower than the GOOD Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAND and GOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-0.11
2.32
LAND
GOOD

Dividends

LAND vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison

LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, less than GOOD's 6.98% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
4.35%3.82%2.98%1.60%3.69%4.12%4.60%3.91%4.40%5.38%3.36%9.20%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
6.98%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%8.35%

Drawdowns

LAND vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -68.33%, roughly equal to the maximum GOOD drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and GOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-66.23%
-15.29%
LAND
GOOD

Volatility

LAND vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is 6.09%, while Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a volatility of 7.99%. This indicates that LAND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.09%
7.99%
LAND
GOOD

Financials

LAND vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items