LAND vs. GOOD
LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) and GOOD (Gladstone Commercial Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Real Estate sector — LAND in REIT - Specialty, GOOD in REIT - Diversified. Over the past 10 years, LAND returned 0.68%/yr vs 4.73%/yr for GOOD. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAND vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than GOOD's 24.17% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 0.68%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 4.73% annualized return.
LAND
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -25.12%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- -5.52%
- 3Y*
- -17.37%
- 5Y*
- -15.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.19%
GOOD
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- YTD
- 24.17%
- 1Y
- 6.25%
- 3Y*
- 7.14%
- 5Y*
- -3.76%
- 10Y*
- 4.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.54%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.11M | $5.40M | $6.46M | |
| $4.98M | $4.95M | $5.67M |
LAND vs. GOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -8.31% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 24.17% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and GOOD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.44 |
The correlation between LAND and GOOD shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (all time) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
LAND:
$349.84M
GOOD:
$605.09M
LAND:
-$0.31
GOOD:
$0.67
LAND:
3.56
GOOD:
2.37
LAND:
$86.33M
GOOD:
$165.74M
LAND:
$12.83M
GOOD:
-$19.45M
LAND:
$64.70M
GOOD:
$45.52M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. GOOD — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
GOOD
LAND vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.47 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.06 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 0.26 | -0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 0.53 | -0.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAND vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.56%, which is greater than GOOD's maximum drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and GOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.56% | -67.22% | -9.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.48% | -20.09% | -13.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.15% | -35.29% | -8.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.56% | -53.30% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.56% | -66.25% | -10.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.56% | -27.77% | -48.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.14% | -13.52% | -17.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.37% | 9.62% | +5.75% |
Volatility
LAND vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is 5.82%, while Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that LAND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 6.27% | -0.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 16.85% | +4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.34% | 22.25% | +5.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 25.14% | +6.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 32.24% | -2.28% |
Dividends
LAND vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than GOOD's 9.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 9.60% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.91% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Financials
LAND vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAND vs. GOOD - Profitability Comparison
LAND - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.
GOOD - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
LAND - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.
GOOD - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.
LAND - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.
GOOD - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 6.97M and revenue of 41.91M, resulting in a net margin of 16.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAND and GOOD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GOOD has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to LAND (5.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.56% vs GOOD's -67.22%.
GOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.23 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAND and GOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer