PortfoliosLab logo
LAND vs. GOOD
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LAND and GOOD is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

LAND vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LAND:

-0.89

GOOD:

0.13

Sortino Ratio

LAND:

-1.06

GOOD:

0.54

Omega Ratio

LAND:

0.87

GOOD:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

LAND:

-0.29

GOOD:

0.17

Martin Ratio

LAND:

-1.09

GOOD:

0.69

Ulcer Index

LAND:

20.24%

GOOD:

8.53%

Daily Std Dev

LAND:

27.04%

GOOD:

20.86%

Max Drawdown

LAND:

-76.09%

GOOD:

-67.22%

Current Drawdown

LAND:

-73.77%

GOOD:

-27.07%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAND:

$344.84M

GOOD:

$657.68M

EPS

LAND:

-$0.25

GOOD:

$0.30

PEG Ratio

LAND:

22.95

GOOD:

-62.67

PS Ratio

LAND:

4.22

GOOD:

4.35

PB Ratio

LAND:

0.50

GOOD:

3.63

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAND:

$81.77M

GOOD:

$151.17M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAND:

$76.18M

GOOD:

$118.59M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAND:

$50.79M

GOOD:

$118.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -8.35% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's -9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 2.37%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 6.02% annualized return.


LAND

YTD

-8.35%

1M

2.69%

6M

-16.23%

1Y

-23.92%

5Y*

-2.38%

10Y*

2.37%

GOOD

YTD

-9.92%

1M

3.32%

6M

-11.81%

1Y

2.69%

5Y*

7.71%

10Y*

6.02%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LAND vs. GOOD — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAND
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LAND is 1717
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LAND is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LAND is 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LAND is 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LAND is 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LAND is 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

GOOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GOOD is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GOOD is 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GOOD is 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LAND vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LAND Sharpe Ratio is -0.89, which is lower than the GOOD Sharpe Ratio of 0.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAND and GOOD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LAND vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison

LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than GOOD's 8.42% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
5.77%5.20%3.82%2.98%1.60%3.69%4.12%4.60%3.91%4.40%5.38%3.36%
GOOD
Gladstone Commercial Corporation
8.42%7.39%9.06%8.13%5.83%8.34%6.86%8.37%7.12%7.46%10.28%8.74%

Drawdowns

LAND vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.09%, which is greater than GOOD's maximum drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and GOOD. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LAND vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison

Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a higher volatility of 8.28% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 4.73%. This indicates that LAND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LAND vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


15.00M20.00M25.00M30.00M35.00M40.00M20212022202320242025
16.80M
37.50M
(LAND) Total Revenue
(GOOD) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAND vs. GOOD - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gladstone Land Corporation and Gladstone Commercial Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
93.3%
77.4%
(LAND) Gross Margin
(GOOD) Gross Margin
LAND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 15.68M and revenue of 16.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 93.3%.

GOOD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a gross profit of 29.03M and revenue of 37.50M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 77.4%.

LAND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 3.68M and revenue of 16.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.9%.

GOOD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported an operating income of 13.64M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.4%.

LAND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of 9.11M and revenue of 16.80M, resulting in a net margin of 54.2%.

GOOD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gladstone Commercial Corporation reported a net income of 5.13M and revenue of 37.50M, resulting in a net margin of 13.7%.