LAND vs. GOOD
Compare and contrast key facts about Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD).
Performance
LAND vs. GOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
LAND vs. GOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 13.63% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 11.18% | -28.11% | 33.25% | -21.63% | -22.52% | 53.53% | -9.58% | 30.74% | -7.82% | 12.41% |
Fundamentals
LAND:
$374.56M
GOOD:
$545.82M
LAND:
-$0.29
GOOD:
$0.41
LAND:
4.89
GOOD:
3.36
LAND:
$76.13M
GOOD:
$161.34M
LAND:
$66.54M
GOOD:
$0.00
LAND:
$94.39M
GOOD:
$58.25M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a 13.63% return, which is significantly higher than GOOD's 11.18% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed GOOD with an annualized return of 4.39%, while GOOD has yielded a comparatively higher 4.79% annualized return.
LAND
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -15.25%
- YTD
- 13.63%
- 6M
- 13.17%
- 1Y
- 4.73%
- 3Y*
- -10.82%
- 5Y*
- -7.79%
- 10Y*
- 4.39%
GOOD
- 1D
- 1.14%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- 11.18%
- 6M
- -0.75%
- 1Y
- -15.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.21%
- 5Y*
- -2.65%
- 10Y*
- 4.79%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. GOOD — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
GOOD
LAND vs. GOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.15 | -0.69 | +0.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.43 | -0.86 | +1.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 0.90 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.16 | -0.58 | +0.74 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | -1.02 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 | -0.69 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.25 | -0.11 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | 0.15 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.21 | -0.16 |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and GOOD is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
LAND vs. GOOD - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than GOOD's 10.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 5.46% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
GOOD Gladstone Commercial Corporation | 10.38% | 11.25% | 7.39% | 9.06% | 8.13% | 5.83% | 8.34% | 6.86% | 8.37% | 7.12% | 7.46% | 10.28% |
Drawdowns
LAND vs. GOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, which is greater than GOOD's maximum drawdown of -67.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and GOOD.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.45% | -67.22% | -9.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.69% | -26.07% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.45% | -53.30% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.45% | -66.25% | -10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -70.95% | -35.32% | -35.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.09% | -13.30% | -16.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.26% | 14.74% | -3.48% |
Volatility
LAND vs. GOOD - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a higher volatility of 9.71% compared to Gladstone Commercial Corporation (GOOD) at 6.85%. This indicates that LAND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | GOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.71% | 6.85% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.94% | 16.76% | +5.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.48% | 22.42% | +9.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.69% | 24.86% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.95% | 32.11% | -2.16% |
Financials
LAND vs. GOOD - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Gladstone Commercial Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities