LAND vs. DBA
LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) is a stock, while DBA (Invesco DB Agriculture Fund) is Agricultural Commodities fund tracking the DBIQ Diversified Agriculture Index Excess Return. Over the past 10 years, LAND returned 0.68%/yr vs 4.57%/yr for DBA. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAND vs. DBA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than DBA's 7.80% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed DBA with an annualized return of 0.68%, while DBA has yielded a comparatively higher 4.57% annualized return.
LAND
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -25.12%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- -5.52%
- 3Y*
- -17.37%
- 5Y*
- -15.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.19%
DBA
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 2.88%
- 6M
- 7.21%
- YTD
- 7.80%
- 1Y
- 11.03%
- 3Y*
- 12.21%
- 5Y*
- 10.82%
- 10Y*
- 4.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.46%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.27M | $23.75M | $33.82M | |
| $4.98M | $4.95M | $5.67M |
LAND vs. DBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -8.31% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 7.80% | -0.56% | 33.45% | 7.64% | 2.53% | 22.37% | -2.54% | -0.71% | -8.74% | -6.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and DBA is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.08 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. DBA — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
DBA
LAND vs. DBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAND | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 1.16 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 2.40 | -2.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAND vs. DBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.56%, which is greater than DBA's maximum drawdown of -67.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and DBA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.56% | -67.97% | -8.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.48% | -8.67% | -24.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.15% | -12.36% | -31.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.56% | -15.94% | -60.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.56% | -35.64% | -40.92% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.56% | -24.11% | -52.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.14% | -40.97% | +9.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.37% | 4.19% | +11.18% |
Volatility
LAND vs. DBA - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Invesco DB Agriculture Fund (DBA) at 4.72%. This indicates that LAND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | DBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 4.72% | +1.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 8.10% | +13.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.34% | 11.12% | +16.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 13.78% | +17.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 13.05% | +16.91% |
Dividends
LAND vs. DBA - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, more than DBA's 3.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBA Invesco DB Agriculture Fund | 3.32% | 3.58% | 4.08% | 4.63% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 1.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.91% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAND and DBA have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAND has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to DBA (4.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.56% vs DBA's -67.97%.
DBA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.91 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAND and DBA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer