PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAND vs. EXR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAND vs. EXR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -1.62% return, which is significantly lower than EXR's 16.03% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed EXR with an annualized return of 2.00%, while EXR has yielded a comparatively higher 9.53% annualized return.


LAND

1D
2.42%
1M
-8.64%
YTD
-1.62%
6M
2.76%
1Y
-11.30%
3Y*
-14.00%
5Y*
-15.87%
10Y*
2.00%

EXR

1D
1.15%
1M
4.23%
YTD
16.03%
6M
16.77%
1Y
3.81%
3Y*
5.87%
5Y*
1.96%
10Y*
9.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAND vs. EXR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
-1.62%-10.69%-21.63%-18.49%-44.42%136.25%17.35%18.07%-10.82%24.66%
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
16.03%-8.92%-2.81%13.86%-32.82%100.98%13.64%20.71%7.29%17.83%

Correlation

The correlation between LAND and EXR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013

0.29

The correlation between LAND and EXR shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAND:

$357.49M

EXR:

$32.55B

EPS

LAND:

-$0.31

EXR:

$4.36

PS Ratio

LAND:

3.79

EXR:

9.42

PB Ratio

LAND:

0.52

EXR:

2.44

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAND:

$86.33M

EXR:

$3.39B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAND:

$12.83M

EXR:

$345.79M

EBITDA (TTM)

LAND:

$64.70M

EXR:

$2.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAND vs. EXR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAND
LAND Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LAND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAND Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
LAND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAND Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

EXR
EXR Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EXR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EXR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EXR Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EXR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EXR Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAND vs. EXR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LANDEXRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.74

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.05

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.37

0.23

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.75

0.47

-1.22

LAND vs. EXR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAND Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the EXR Sharpe Ratio of 0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAND and EXR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAND vs. EXR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, which is greater than EXR's maximum drawdown of -71.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and EXR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LANDEXRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-76.45%

-71.22%

-5.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-30.47%

-16.70%

-13.77%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-45.24%

-33.78%

-11.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.45%

-51.36%

-25.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-76.45%

-51.36%

-25.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.85%

-21.43%

-53.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-30.79%

-13.39%

-17.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.12%

8.17%

+6.95%

Volatility

LAND vs. EXR - Volatility Comparison

Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a higher volatility of 6.67% compared to Extra Space Storage Inc. (EXR) at 5.60%. This indicates that LAND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EXR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LANDEXRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.67%

5.60%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.34%

16.84%

+5.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

29.56%

24.90%

+4.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.40%

28.22%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.96%

26.95%

+3.01%

Dividends

LAND vs. EXR - Dividend Comparison

LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.40%, more than EXR's 4.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EXR
Extra Space Storage Inc.
4.39%4.98%4.33%4.04%4.08%1.98%3.11%3.37%3.71%3.57%3.79%2.54%
LAND
Gladstone Land Corporation
6.40%6.12%5.16%3.83%2.98%1.60%3.67%4.12%4.63%3.90%4.40%5.38%

Financials

LAND vs. EXR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Extra Space Storage Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00M1.00B20222023202420252026
14.80M
856.03M
(LAND) Total Revenue
(EXR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LAND vs. EXR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gladstone Land Corporation and Extra Space Storage Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
98.9%
0
Portfolio components
LAND - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.

EXR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Extra Space Storage Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 856.03M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

LAND - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.

EXR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Extra Space Storage Inc. reported an operating income of 367.55M and revenue of 856.03M, resulting in an operating margin of 42.9%.

LAND - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.

EXR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Extra Space Storage Inc. reported a net income of 240.98M and revenue of 856.03M, resulting in a net margin of 28.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LAND and EXR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAND has higher volatility (6.67%) compared to EXR (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.45% vs EXR's -71.22%.

EXR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.15 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAND and EXR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer