LAND vs. LMT
LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) and LMT (Lockheed Martin Corporation) are both stocks. LAND operates in REIT - Specialty (Real Estate), while LMT operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, LAND returned 1.32%/yr vs 11.54%/yr for LMT. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAND vs. LMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than LMT's 21.88% return. Over the past 10 years, LAND has underperformed LMT with an annualized return of 1.32%, while LMT has yielded a comparatively higher 11.54% annualized return.
LAND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -7.01%
- 3Y*
- -16.85%
- 5Y*
- -15.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
LMT
- 1D
- 2.46%
- 1M
- 15.36%
- 6M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 42.06%
- 3Y*
- 11.61%
- 5Y*
- 11.85%
- 10Y*
- 11.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.89M | $5.73M | $5.80M | |
| $682.65M | $676.87M | $688.00M |
LAND vs. LMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -3.62% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 24.66% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 21.88% | 2.47% | 10.02% | -4.31% | 40.48% | 3.15% | -6.49% | 52.55% | -16.35% | 31.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and LMT is 0.11, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.11 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.14 |
Fundamentals
LAND:
$367.74M
LMT:
$134.34B
LAND:
-$0.31
LMT:
$27.13
LAND:
3.74
LMT:
1.75
LAND:
0.51
LMT:
15.36
LAND:
$86.33M
LMT:
$77.02B
LAND:
$12.83M
LMT:
$9.09B
LAND:
$64.70M
LMT:
$9.86B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. LMT — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
LMT
LAND vs. LMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAND | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.28 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 1.58 | -2.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 3.38 | -4.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAND vs. LMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, roughly equal to the maximum LMT drawdown of -79.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and LMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.45% | -79.29% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.74% | -26.87% | -3.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.87% | -31.79% | -12.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.45% | -31.79% | -44.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.45% | -36.67% | -39.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.36% | -13.34% | -62.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -26.82% | -4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.36% | 12.54% | +4.82% |
Volatility
LAND vs. LMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) is 5.65%, while Lockheed Martin Corporation (LMT) has a volatility of 12.24%. This indicates that LAND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | LMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 12.24% | -6.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.32% | 22.08% | +0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.03% | 27.06% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.31% | 23.79% | +7.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 24.18% | +5.78% |
Dividends
LAND vs. LMT - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than LMT's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.57% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
LMT Lockheed Martin Corporation | 2.34% | 2.76% | 2.62% | 2.68% | 2.34% | 2.98% | 2.76% | 2.31% | 3.13% | 2.32% | 2.71% | 2.83% |
Financials
LAND vs. LMT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gladstone Land Corporation and Lockheed Martin Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
LAND vs. LMT - Profitability Comparison
LAND - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a gross profit of 14.64M and revenue of 14.80M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 98.9%.
LMT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.45B and revenue of 20.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.2%.
LAND - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported an operating income of 12.68M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in an operating margin of 85.7%.
LMT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported an operating income of 2.48B and revenue of 20.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.4%.
LAND - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Gladstone Land Corporation reported a net income of -9.99M and revenue of 14.80M, resulting in a net margin of -67.5%.
LMT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Lockheed Martin Corporation reported a net income of 1.84B and revenue of 20.06B, resulting in a net margin of 9.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
LAND and LMT have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LMT has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to LAND (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.45% vs LMT's -79.29%.
LMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAND and LMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer