LAND vs. DBMF
LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) is a stock, while DBMF (iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF) is Systematic Trend fund actively managed by iM Global Partners. Over the past 5 years, LAND returned -15.15%/yr vs 8.70%/yr for DBMF. Their 0.04 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAND vs. DBMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -3.62% return, which is significantly lower than DBMF's 12.95% return.
LAND
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.84%
- 6M
- -8.77%
- YTD
- -3.62%
- 1Y
- -7.01%
- 3Y*
- -16.85%
- 5Y*
- -15.15%
- 10Y*
- 1.32%
- ALL TIME*
- 0.18%
DBMF
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 7.95%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 27.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.70%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $48.88M | $50.74M | $48.74M | |
| $4.89M | $5.73M | $5.80M |
LAND vs. DBMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -3.62% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 6.87% |
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 12.95% | 13.85% | 7.24% | -8.94% | 21.61% | 11.49% | 1.80% | 10.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and DBMF is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019 | 0.04 |
The correlation between LAND and DBMF shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (5 years) to 0.13 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. DBMF — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
DBMF
LAND vs. DBMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAND | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.45 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 4.59 | -5.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.07 | 15.59 | -16.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAND vs. DBMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.45%, which is greater than DBMF's maximum drawdown of -20.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and DBMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.45% | -20.39% | -56.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.74% | -6.10% | -24.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.87% | -15.60% | -28.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.45% | -20.39% | -56.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -75.36% | -0.25% | -75.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.08% | -6.49% | -24.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.36% | 1.79% | +15.57% |
Volatility
LAND vs. DBMF - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a higher volatility of 5.65% compared to iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF (DBMF) at 2.42%. This indicates that LAND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DBMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | DBMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.65% | 2.42% | +3.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.32% | 9.96% | +12.36% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.03% | 12.66% | +16.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.31% | 12.43% | +18.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 12.37% | +17.59% |
Dividends
LAND vs. DBMF - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than DBMF's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBMF iMGP DBi Managed Futures Strategy ETF | 5.03% | 5.91% | 5.75% | 2.91% | 7.72% | 10.38% | 0.86% | 9.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.57% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAND and DBMF have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAND has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to DBMF (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.45% vs DBMF's -20.39%.
DBMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAND and DBMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer