LAND vs. BCI
LAND (Gladstone Land Corporation) is a stock, while BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Over the past 5 years, LAND returned -15.74%/yr vs 10.01%/yr for BCI. Their 0.14 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
LAND vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, LAND achieves a -8.31% return, which is significantly lower than BCI's 22.53% return.
LAND
- 1D
- -2.05%
- 1M
- -5.73%
- 6M
- -25.12%
- YTD
- -8.31%
- 1Y
- -5.52%
- 3Y*
- -17.37%
- 5Y*
- -15.74%
- 10Y*
- 0.68%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.19%
BCI
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 7.31%
- 6M
- 10.17%
- YTD
- 22.53%
- 1Y
- 35.51%
- 3Y*
- 11.89%
- 5Y*
- 10.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.06%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.67M | $55.32M | $39.13M | |
| $4.98M | $4.95M | $5.67M |
LAND vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | -8.31% | -10.69% | -21.63% | -18.49% | -44.42% | 136.25% | 17.35% | 18.07% | -10.82% | 25.33% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 22.53% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between LAND and BCI is -0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | 0.14 |
The correlation between LAND and BCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LAND vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
LAND
BCI
LAND vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| LAND | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.35 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | 2.37 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 7.60 | -8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
LAND vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LAND drawdown since its inception was -76.56%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAND and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LAND | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.56% | -32.69% | -43.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.48% | -14.82% | -18.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -44.15% | -14.82% | -29.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.56% | -26.50% | -50.06% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -76.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.56% | -7.64% | -68.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.14% | -11.96% | -19.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.37% | 4.61% | +10.76% |
Volatility
LAND vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
Gladstone Land Corporation (LAND) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 5.02%. This indicates that LAND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LAND | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.82% | 5.02% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.23% | 15.08% | +6.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.34% | 17.55% | +9.79% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.33% | 16.85% | +14.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.96% | 15.68% | +14.28% |
Dividends
LAND vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
LAND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.91%, less than BCI's 13.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 13.46% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LAND Gladstone Land Corporation | 6.91% | 6.12% | 5.16% | 3.83% | 2.98% | 1.60% | 3.67% | 4.12% | 4.63% | 3.90% | 4.40% | 5.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LAND and BCI have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LAND has higher volatility (5.82%) compared to BCI (5.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAND dropped -76.56% vs BCI's -32.69%.
BCI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for LAND and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer