PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LADR vs. LOAN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LADR vs. LOAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LADR achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than LOAN's -3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, LADR has underperformed LOAN with an annualized return of 6.25%, while LOAN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.47% annualized return.


LADR

1D
0.89%
1M
1.90%
YTD
-4.97%
6M
-6.32%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
7.11%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
6.25%

LOAN

1D
0.23%
1M
3.79%
YTD
-3.60%
6M
-7.54%
1Y
-8.33%
3Y*
2.94%
5Y*
-0.61%
10Y*
7.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LADR vs. LOAN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
-4.97%6.69%5.53%25.22%-8.95%31.28%-40.80%26.36%24.54%8.52%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
-3.60%-9.37%22.47%2.12%5.67%13.92%-10.36%21.90%1.46%-16.15%

Correlation

The correlation between LADR and LOAN is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2014

0.13

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LADR:

$1.29B

LOAN:

$50.07M

EPS

LADR:

$0.44

LOAN:

$0.44

PE Ratio

LADR:

23.39

LOAN:

9.99

PEG Ratio

LADR:

1.11

LOAN:

5.17

PS Ratio

LADR:

3.21

LOAN:

5.91

PB Ratio

LADR:

0.89

LOAN:

1.16

Total Revenue (TTM)

LADR:

$400.28M

LOAN:

$8.47M

Gross Profit (TTM)

LADR:

$284.72M

LOAN:

$6.80M

EBITDA (TTM)

LADR:

$276.22M

LOAN:

$5.02M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LADR vs. LOAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LADR
LADR Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
LADR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LADR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
LADR Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
LADR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
LADR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

LOAN
LOAN Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
LOAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LOAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
LOAN Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
LOAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
LOAN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LADR vs. LOAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LADRLOANDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.95

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.33

-0.38

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.73

-0.59

+1.32

LADR vs. LOAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LADR Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is higher than the LOAN Sharpe Ratio of -0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LADR and LOAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LADR vs. LOAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LADR drawdown since its inception was -81.63%, smaller than the maximum LOAN drawdown of -90.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LADR and LOAN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LADRLOANDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.63%

-90.93%

+9.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.68%

-22.10%

+7.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.22%

-22.22%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.97%

-32.59%

+5.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-81.63%

-59.16%

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.32%

-17.77%

+8.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.28%

-46.41%

+28.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

14.15%

-7.49%

Volatility

LADR vs. LOAN - Volatility Comparison

Ladder Capital Corp (LADR) has a higher volatility of 5.72% compared to Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. (LOAN) at 4.21%. This indicates that LADR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LOAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LADRLOANDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.72%

4.21%

+1.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.53%

13.94%

+0.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.39%

21.68%

-3.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.76%

26.12%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

48.24%

34.41%

+13.83%

Dividends

LADR vs. LOAN - Dividend Comparison

LADR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.02%, less than LOAN's 10.39% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LADR
Ladder Capital Corp
9.02%8.37%8.22%7.99%8.76%6.67%9.61%7.54%9.92%8.91%9.37%17.91%
LOAN
Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.
10.39%9.89%8.21%9.05%9.38%8.82%8.06%7.55%8.54%6.97%4.93%9.68%

Financials

LADR vs. LOAN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ladder Capital Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M20222023202420252026
103.34M
2.07M
(LADR) Total Revenue
(LOAN) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LADR vs. LOAN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ladder Capital Corp and Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
70.8%
82.4%
Portfolio components
LADR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a gross profit of 73.11M and revenue of 103.34M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.8%.

LOAN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.70M and revenue of 2.07M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 82.4%.

LADR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported an operating income of 54.63M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.

LOAN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

LADR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ladder Capital Corp reported a net income of 2.61M and revenue of 103.34M, resulting in a net margin of 2.5%.

LOAN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Manhattan Bridge Capital, Inc. reported a net income of 1.27M and revenue of 2.07M, resulting in a net margin of 61.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


LADR and LOAN have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LADR has higher volatility (5.72%) compared to LOAN (4.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LADR dropped -81.63% vs LOAN's -90.93%.

LADR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.27 vs -0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LADR and LOAN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer