PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
LAC vs. PPTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

LAC vs. PPTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LAC achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly higher than PPTA's -1.69% return.


LAC

1D
-1.60%
1M
-11.70%
YTD
-1.38%
6M
-11.89%
1Y
69.96%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PPTA

1D
-2.14%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
-1.69%
6M
-14.08%
1Y
83.22%
3Y*
87.68%
5Y*
22.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LAC vs. PPTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
LAC
Lithium Americas Corp.
-1.38%46.80%-53.59%-27.19%
PPTA
Perpetua Resources Corp
-1.69%126.90%236.59%-2.76%

Correlation

The correlation between LAC and PPTA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2023

0.35

The correlation between LAC and PPTA shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.51 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LAC:

$1.52B

PPTA:

$2.22B

EPS

LAC:

-$0.28

PPTA:

$1.22

PB Ratio

LAC:

1.13

PPTA:

2.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

LAC:

$0.00

PPTA:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

LAC:

-$580.22K

PPTA:

$0.00

EBITDA (TTM)

LAC:

-$52.10M

PPTA:

$0.00

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

LAC vs. PPTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LAC
LAC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
LAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAC Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAC Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

PPTA
PPTA Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
PPTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PPTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PPTA Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
PPTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
PPTA Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LAC vs. PPTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


LACPPTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.22

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.11

1.96

-0.85

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.66

5.01

-3.35

LAC vs. PPTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LAC Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the PPTA Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LAC and PPTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

LAC vs. PPTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LAC drawdown since its inception was -81.83%, roughly equal to the maximum PPTA drawdown of -81.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LAC and PPTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


LACPPTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.83%

-81.78%

-0.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.08%

-42.61%

-20.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-63.31%

-36.06%

-27.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-63.12%

-38.68%

-24.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.21%

16.67%

+25.54%

Volatility

LAC vs. PPTA - Volatility Comparison

Lithium Americas Corp. (LAC) and Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) have volatilities of 21.40% and 21.31%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


LACPPTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.40%

21.31%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

52.93%

55.26%

-2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.28%

73.32%

+58.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.20%

72.07%

+29.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.20%

72.19%

+29.01%

Dividends

LAC vs. PPTA - Dividend Comparison

Neither LAC nor PPTA has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

LAC vs. PPTA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lithium Americas Corp. and Perpetua Resources Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002022202320242025202600
(LAC) Total Revenue
(PPTA) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


LAC and PPTA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAC has higher volatility (21.40%) compared to PPTA (21.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LAC dropped -81.83% vs PPTA's -81.78%.

PPTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for LAC and PPTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer