PPTA vs. AEM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM).

Performance

PPTA vs. AEM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PPTA vs. AEM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PPTA Perpetua Resources Corp	16.15%	126.90%	236.59%	8.56%	-38.53%	-41.36%
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	19.95%	119.53%	46.04%	8.98%	1.08%	-10.91%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PPTA : $2.62B AEM : $102.04B
EPS PPTA : $1.22 AEM : $8.83
PE Ratio PPTA : 22.98 AEM : 22.98
PEG Ratio PPTA : 0.06 AEM : 0.36
PB Ratio PPTA : 3.04 AEM : 4.12
Total Revenue (TTM) PPTA : $0.00 AEM : $11.87B
Gross Profit (TTM) PPTA : $0.00 AEM : $6.80B
EBITDA (TTM) PPTA : $0.00 AEM : $8.35B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PPTA achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than AEM's 19.95% return.

PPTA

• 1D: 11.10%
• 1M: -23.71%
• YTD: 16.15%
• 6M: 39.00%
• 1Y: 163.05%
• 3Y*: 84.88%
• 5Y*: 34.04%
• 10Y*: —

AEM

• 1D: 5.80%
• 1M: -19.18%
• YTD: 19.95%
• 6M: 20.91%
• 1Y: 89.16%
• 3Y*: 61.82%
• 5Y*: 30.88%
• 10Y*: 20.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PPTA vs. AEM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PPTA

PPTA Risk / Return Rank: 89
PPTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
PPTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
PPTA Omega Ratio Rank: 85
PPTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
PPTA Martin Ratio Rank: 91

AEM

AEM Risk / Return Rank: 88
AEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
AEM Omega Ratio Rank: 86
AEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
AEM Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PPTA vs. AEM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) and Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PPTA	AEM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	2.04	-0.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.32	2.33	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.33	-0.01
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.77	3.14	+1.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.33	10.90	+0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PPTA vs. AEM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PPTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the AEM Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PPTA and AEM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PPTA	AEM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	2.04	-0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.85	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.56	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.38	0.18	+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between PPTA and AEM is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PPTA vs. AEM - Dividend Comparison

PPTA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PPTA Perpetua Resources Corp	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
AEM Agnico Eagle Mines Limited	0.81%	0.94%	2.05%	2.92%	3.08%	2.63%	2.36%	0.89%	1.09%	0.89%	0.86%	1.22%

Drawdowns

PPTA vs. AEM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PPTA drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, smaller than the maximum AEM drawdown of -90.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PPTA and AEM.

Drawdown Indicators

	PPTA	AEM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-81.78%	-90.49%	+8.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-32.86%	-28.97%	-3.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-81.78%	-46.76%	-35.02%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-53.86%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-24.45%	-19.51%	-4.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-39.28%	-46.76%	+7.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	13.84%	8.35%	+5.49%

Volatility

PPTA vs. AEM - Volatility Comparison

Perpetua Resources Corp (PPTA) has a higher volatility of 21.57% compared to Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (AEM) at 16.46%. This indicates that PPTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PPTA	AEM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	21.57%	16.46%	+5.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.41%	35.61%	+20.80%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.37%	43.99%	+37.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	71.25%	36.39%	+34.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.96%	37.45%	+34.51%

Financials