LABU vs. FNGU

Last updated Jun 10, 2026

LABU (Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares) and FNGU (MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs) are both Leveraged Equities funds - LABU tracks the S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%) while FNGU tracks the NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, LABU returned 184.28% vs 26.92% for FNGU. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. LABU charges 1.12%/yr vs 2.60%/yr for FNGU.

Performance

LABU vs. FNGU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LABU achieves a 6.64% return, which is significantly lower than FNGU's 7.13% return.

LABU

• 1D: 6.80%
• 1M: -10.49%
• YTD: 6.64%
• 6M: 8.23%
• 1Y: 184.28%
• 3Y*: 7.22%
• 5Y*: -35.06%
• 10Y*: -12.12%

FNGU

• 1D: -4.08%
• 1M: -7.33%
• YTD: 7.13%
• 6M: -9.44%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LABU vs. FNGU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	6.64%	71.45%
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	7.13%	3.02%

Correlation

The correlation between LABU and FNGU is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.31
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2025	0.39

LABU vs. FNGU - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	LABU	FNGU
Healthcare	99.8%	-
Financial Services	0.2%	-
Basic Materials	0.0%	-
Communication Services	-	29.8%
Consumer Cyclical	-	9.6%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	60.6%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

LABU vs. FNGU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LABU

LABU Risk / Return Rank: 79
LABU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
LABU Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
LABU Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LABU Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
LABU Martin Ratio Rank: 88

FNGU

FNGU Risk / Return Rank: 18
FNGU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FNGU Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FNGU Omega Ratio Rank: 21
FNGU Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
FNGU Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LABU vs. FNGU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) and MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LABU	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.41	0.45	+1.96
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.79	0.98	+1.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	1.12	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.04	0.45	+5.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.12	1.09	+16.02
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LABU vs. FNGU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LABU Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is higher than the FNGU Sharpe Ratio of 0.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LABU and FNGU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LABU	FNGU	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.41	0.45	+1.96
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.23	0.10	-0.33

Drawdowns

LABU vs. FNGU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LABU drawdown since its inception was -99.18%, which is greater than FNGU's maximum drawdown of -61.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LABU and FNGU.

Drawdown Indicators

	LABU	FNGU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.18%	-61.30%	-37.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.70%	-59.55%	+28.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-78.30%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-97.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-98.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-96.24%	-25.15%	-71.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-81.67%	-22.20%	-59.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.81%	24.72%	-13.91%

Volatility

LABU vs. FNGU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares (LABU) has a higher volatility of 29.37% compared to MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs (FNGU) at 25.34%. This indicates that LABU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNGU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LABU	FNGU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	29.37%	25.34%	+4.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	60.90%	48.90%	+12.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	77.11%	60.41%	+16.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	95.62%	79.70%	+15.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	95.44%	79.70%	+15.74%

LABU vs. FNGU - Expense Ratio Comparison

LABU has a 1.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNGU's 2.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

LABU vs. FNGU - Dividend Comparison

LABU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, while FNGU has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FNGU MicroSectors FANG+ 3X Leveraged ETNs	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LABU Direxion Daily S&P Biotech Bull 3x Shares	0.72%	0.84%	0.35%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.28%	0.64%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LABU and FNGU in my portfolio?

LABU and FNGU have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LABU or FNGU?

LABU has higher volatility (29.37%) compared to FNGU (25.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LABU dropped -99.18% vs FNGU's -61.30%.

Which ETF is better, LABU or FNGU?

On 1-year performance, LABU leads with 184.28% vs 26.92% for FNGU. On fees, LABU is cheaper at 1.12% per year. On volatility, FNGU has been the lower-risk option at 25.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, LABU or FNGU?

Over the 1-year period, LABU has performed better with a 184.28% return vs 26.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, LABU or FNGU?

LABU is cheaper with a 1.12% expense ratio, compared with 2.60% for FNGU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, LABU or FNGU?

LABU has the higher dividend yield at 0.72%, compared with 0.00% for FNGU.

What is the main difference between LABU and FNGU?

LABU tracks S&P Biotechnology Select Industry Index (300%), while FNGU tracks NYSE FANG+ Index (Gross Total Return) (300%). They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Bank of Montreal. Their fees differ too: 1.12% for LABU and 2.60% for FNGU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LABU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 0.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.