KXI vs. FSTA
KXI (iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF) and FSTA (Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - KXI tracks the S&P Global Consumer Staples Index while FSTA tracks the MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KXI returned 6.05%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for FSTA. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KXI charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FSTA.
Performance
KXI vs. FSTA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KXI achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly lower than FSTA's 8.86% return. Over the past 10 years, KXI has underperformed FSTA with an annualized return of 6.05%, while FSTA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.
KXI
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
FSTA
- 1D
- 1.73%
- 1M
- -0.47%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 8.88%
- 1Y
- 5.28%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
KXI vs. FSTA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KXI iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | 5.81% | 9.68% | 4.20% | 2.41% | -6.02% | 13.71% | 7.69% | 23.40% | -10.71% | 17.60% |
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 8.86% | 1.82% | 13.31% | 2.29% | -1.72% | 17.44% | 10.96% | 26.84% | -8.49% | 12.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between KXI and FSTA is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2013 | 0.90 |
The correlation between KXI and FSTA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
KXI vs. FSTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KXI
FSTA
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
KXI
FSTA
Consumer Cyclical
KXI
FSTA
Basic Materials
KXI
-
FSTA
Communication Services
KXI
-
FSTA
-
Energy
KXI
-
FSTA
-
Financial Services
KXI
-
FSTA
-
Healthcare
KXI
-
FSTA
Industrials
KXI
-
FSTA
Real Estate
KXI
-
FSTA
-
Technology
KXI
-
FSTA
-
Utilities
KXI
-
FSTA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KXI vs. FSTA — Risk / Return Rank
KXI
FSTA
KXI vs. FSTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KXI | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.08 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 0.57 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KXI vs. FSTA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KXI drawdown since its inception was -42.27%, which is greater than FSTA's maximum drawdown of -25.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KXI and FSTA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KXI | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.27% | -25.13% | -17.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -9.29% | -0.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -11.76% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.45% | -16.58% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.59% | -25.13% | +0.54% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.00% | -5.90% | -1.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -3.56% | -1.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 4.71% | +0.16% |
Volatility
KXI vs. FSTA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is 4.56%, while Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF (FSTA) has a volatility of 4.99%. This indicates that KXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KXI | FSTA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 4.99% | -0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 10.34% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 12.79% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 13.17% | -0.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 14.59% | -0.87% |
KXI vs. FSTA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KXI has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTA's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
KXI vs. FSTA - Dividend Comparison
KXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than FSTA's 2.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSTA Fidelity MSCI Consumer Staples Index ETF | 2.20% | 2.34% | 2.25% | 2.66% | 2.26% | 2.15% | 2.47% | 2.46% | 3.01% | 2.42% | 2.53% | 2.86% |
KXI iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | 2.37% | 2.29% | 2.51% | 2.99% | 1.98% | 2.26% | 2.34% | 2.17% | 2.97% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 2.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.93, KXI and FSTA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSTA has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to KXI (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KXI dropped -42.27% vs FSTA's -25.13%.
On 10-year performance, FSTA leads with 7.91% vs 6.05% for KXI. On fees, FSTA is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, KXI has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FSTA has performed better with a 7.91% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FSTA is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for KXI.
KXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 2.20% for FSTA.
KXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while FSTA tracks MSCI USA IMI Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for KXI and 0.08% for FSTA.
KXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KXI and FSTA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer