KXI vs. RXI
KXI (iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF) and RXI (iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KXI is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while RXI is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KXI returned 6.05%/yr vs 9.97%/yr for RXI. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.46% expense ratio.
Performance
KXI vs. RXI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KXI achieves a 5.81% return, which is significantly higher than RXI's -6.75% return. Over the past 10 years, KXI has underperformed RXI with an annualized return of 6.05%, while RXI has yielded a comparatively higher 9.97% annualized return.
KXI
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- -0.89%
- YTD
- 5.81%
- 6M
- 6.12%
- 1Y
- 5.44%
- 3Y*
- 6.40%
- 5Y*
- 4.58%
- 10Y*
- 6.05%
RXI
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -3.55%
- YTD
- -6.75%
- 6M
- -8.04%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 9.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.41%
- 10Y*
- 9.97%
KXI vs. RXI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KXI iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | 5.81% | 9.68% | 4.20% | 2.41% | -6.02% | 13.71% | 7.69% | 23.40% | -10.71% | 17.60% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | -6.75% | 13.16% | 17.26% | 27.57% | -29.08% | 16.32% | 24.46% | 26.78% | -6.30% | 22.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between KXI and RXI is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 21, 2006 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KXI and RXI has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
KXI vs. RXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KXI
RXI
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
KXI
RXI
Consumer Cyclical
KXI
RXI
Basic Materials
KXI
-
RXI
-
Communication Services
KXI
-
RXI
Energy
KXI
-
RXI
-
Financial Services
KXI
-
RXI
-
Healthcare
KXI
-
RXI
-
Industrials
KXI
-
RXI
Real Estate
KXI
-
RXI
-
Technology
KXI
-
RXI
Utilities
KXI
-
RXI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KXI vs. RXI — Risk / Return Rank
KXI
RXI
KXI vs. RXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) and iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KXI | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.06 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 0.28 | +0.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.12 | 0.81 | +0.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KXI vs. RXI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KXI drawdown since its inception was -42.27%, smaller than the maximum RXI drawdown of -60.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KXI and RXI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KXI | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.27% | -60.36% | +18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.24% | -15.17% | +4.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.92% | -19.64% | +7.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.45% | -35.78% | +18.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.59% | -35.78% | +11.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.00% | -10.37% | +3.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.37% | -10.53% | +5.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 5.34% | -0.47% |
Volatility
KXI vs. RXI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF (KXI) is 4.56%, while iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF (RXI) has a volatility of 5.67%. This indicates that KXI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KXI | RXI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.56% | 5.67% | -1.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.87% | 13.08% | -3.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.14% | 16.71% | -4.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.51% | 21.02% | -8.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.72% | 20.09% | -6.37% |
KXI vs. RXI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both KXI and RXI have an expense ratio of 0.46%.
Dividends
KXI vs. RXI - Dividend Comparison
KXI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.37%, more than RXI's 1.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KXI iShares Global Consumer Staples ETF | 2.37% | 2.29% | 2.51% | 2.99% | 1.98% | 2.26% | 2.34% | 2.17% | 2.97% | 2.17% | 2.34% | 2.20% |
RXI iShares Global Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.49% | 1.55% | 1.07% | 1.00% | 1.00% | 0.89% | 0.65% | 1.48% | 1.73% | 1.26% | 1.77% | 1.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KXI and RXI have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RXI has higher volatility (5.67%) compared to KXI (4.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KXI dropped -42.27% vs RXI's -60.36%.
On 10-year performance, RXI leads with 9.97% vs 6.05% for KXI. Both ETFs have the same 0.46% expense ratio. On volatility, KXI has been the lower-risk option at 4.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RXI has performed better with a 9.97% return vs 6.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KXI and RXI have the same expense ratio: 0.46% per year.
KXI has the higher dividend yield at 2.37%, compared with 1.49% for RXI.
KXI is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while RXI is Consumer Discretionary Equities. KXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Staples Index, while RXI tracks S&P Global Consumer Discretionary Index.
KXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.45 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KXI and RXI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer