KWIN vs. SCHV

Last updated Jul 1, 2026

KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds - KWIN tracks the Wahed Alternative Income Index while SCHV tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWIN charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

KWIN vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KWIN achieves a 1.30% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 18.65% return.

KWIN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: -0.09%
• YTD: 1.30%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHV

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 4.17%
• YTD: 18.65%
• 6M: 17.73%
• 1Y: 28.33%
• 3Y*: 18.49%
• 5Y*: 11.19%
• 10Y*: 11.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWIN vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	1.30%	0.61%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	18.65%	3.93%

Correlation

The correlation between KWIN and SCHV is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.09

Return for Risk

KWIN vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWIN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 89
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWIN vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KWIN	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.54	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.17	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	16.70	—

Drawdowns

KWIN vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KWIN drawdown since its inception was -0.93%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWIN and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	KWIN	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-37.08%	+36.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.09%	-0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.21%	-3.82%	+3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.70%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KWIN	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.53%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.92%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.31%	11.21%	-7.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.31%	14.56%	-11.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.31%	16.92%	-13.61%

KWIN vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWIN has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

KWIN vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.76%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KWIN and SCHV in my portfolio?

KWIN and SCHV have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KWIN or SCHV?

On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KWIN or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for KWIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KWIN or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.

What is the main difference between KWIN and SCHV?

KWIN tracks Wahed Alternative Income Index, while SCHV tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for KWIN and 0.04% for SCHV.