KWEB vs. KBND
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and KBND (KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet, while KBND is a International Government Bonds fund tracking the KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KWEB charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for KBND.
Performance
KWEB vs. KBND - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
KWEB
- 1D
- -3.92%
- 1M
- -4.79%
- YTD
- -20.06%
- 6M
- -22.24%
- 1Y
- -12.78%
- 3Y*
- 4.05%
- 5Y*
- -14.28%
- 10Y*
- 0.02%
KBND
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KWEB vs. KBND - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -20.06% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.89% | 3.13% | -6.81% | 4.41% | 9.38% | 1.25% | -0.09% | 9.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB and KBND is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2014 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWEB vs. KBND — Risk / Return Rank
KWEB
KBND
KWEB vs. KBND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF (KBND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KWEB | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.38 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.76 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KWEB | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.47 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.30 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.06 | — | — |
Drawdowns
KWEB vs. KBND - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWEB | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.92% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.13% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.52% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.24% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.85% | — | — |
Volatility
KWEB vs. KBND - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWEB | KBND | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.52% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.25% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.67% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.99% | — | — |
KWEB vs. KBND - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than KBND's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWEB vs. KBND - Dividend Comparison
KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, while KBND has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KBND KraneShares Bloomberg China Bond Inclusion Index ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 2.20% | 2.51% | 6.97% | 2.27% | 3.47% | 4.98% | 0.00% | 0.04% | 1.16% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.70% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWEB and KBND have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, KBND is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
KBND is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.70%, compared with 0.00% for KBND.
KWEB is categorized as China Equities, while KBND is International Government Bonds. KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet, while KBND tracks KBND-US - Bloomberg China Inclusion Focused Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.76% for KWEB and 0.50% for KBND.
Find the right allocation for KWEB and KBND
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer