KWEB vs. CN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds - KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index while CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. KWEB charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

KWEB vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KWEB

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: -4.91%
• YTD: -20.32%
• 6M: -22.46%
• 1Y: -15.17%
• 3Y*: 4.22%
• 5Y*: -14.33%
• 10Y*: -0.18%

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KWEB vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-20.32%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	58.23%	29.92%	-33.80%	69.73%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-12.74%	31.55%	26.79%	-22.41%	43.69%

Correlation

The correlation between KWEB and CN is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2014	0.70

The correlation between KWEB and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (3 years) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KWEB vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KWEB	CN
Consumer Cyclical	37.7%	5.4%
Communication Services	24.8%	0.4%
Technology	17.6%	0.3%
Healthcare	6.0%	0.8%
Real Estate	5.2%	0.8%
Industrials	3.1%	1.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.1%	0.3%
Financial Services	2.2%	55.1%
Basic Materials	-	0.6%
Energy	-	0.9%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

KWEB vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KWEB vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	KWEB	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.56	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.67	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.92	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.45	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.90	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	KWEB	CN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.00	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KWEB	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-80.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.13%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.17%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-68.62%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.25%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.97%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KWEB	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.09%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.25%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	47.67%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	39.98%	—	—

KWEB vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KWEB has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KWEB vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, while CN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.73%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KWEB and CN in my portfolio?

KWEB and CN have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KWEB or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KWEB or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KWEB or CN?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.73%, compared with 0.00% for CN.

What is the main difference between KWEB and CN?

KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for KWEB and 0.50% for CN.