KWEB vs. CHIQ
KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) and CHIQ (Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF) are both China Equities funds - KWEB tracks the CSI Overseas China Internet Index while CHIQ tracks the MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, KWEB returned 0.00%/yr vs 6.23%/yr for CHIQ. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. KWEB charges 0.70%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CHIQ.
Performance
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KWEB achieves a -19.30% return, which is significantly lower than CHIQ's -14.96% return.
KWEB
- 1D
- 1.78%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- 6M
- -24.46%
- YTD
- -19.30%
- 1Y
- -17.48%
- 3Y*
- 1.80%
- 5Y*
- -11.84%
- 10Y*
- 0.00%
CHIQ
- 1D
- 1.90%
- 1M
- 3.33%
- 6M
- -16.24%
- YTD
- -14.96%
- 1Y
- -14.75%
- 3Y*
- -0.07%
- 5Y*
- -9.85%
- 10Y*
- 6.23%
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | -19.30% | 23.55% | 12.01% | -9.06% | -17.24% | -49.01% | 58.23% | 29.92% | -33.80% | 69.73% |
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | -14.96% | 13.69% | 10.74% | -10.70% | -22.01% | -27.07% | 92.61% | 44.19% | -28.65% | 67.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between KWEB and CHIQ is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2013 | 0.86 |
The correlation between KWEB and CHIQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KWEB
CHIQ
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Technology
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Energy
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
KWEB
CHIQ
Communication Services
KWEB
CHIQ
-
Technology
KWEB
CHIQ
Healthcare
KWEB
CHIQ
-
Industrials
KWEB
CHIQ
Real Estate
KWEB
CHIQ
Consumer Defensive
KWEB
CHIQ
Financial Services
KWEB
CHIQ
-
Basic Materials
KWEB
-
CHIQ
-
Energy
KWEB
-
CHIQ
-
Utilities
KWEB
-
CHIQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KWEB vs. CHIQ — Risk / Return Rank
KWEB
CHIQ
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) and Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KWEB | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.91 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.42 | -0.42 | 0.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | -0.93 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KWEB drawdown since its inception was -80.92%, which is greater than CHIQ's maximum drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KWEB and CHIQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KWEB | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -80.92% | -67.04% | -13.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -41.62% | -35.53% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.62% | -35.53% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.04% | -56.55% | -11.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.92% | -67.04% | -13.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -68.22% | -55.39% | -12.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.54% | -30.79% | -4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.90% | 15.82% | +5.08% |
Volatility
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a higher volatility of 8.46% compared to Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF (CHIQ) at 7.90%. This indicates that KWEB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHIQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KWEB | CHIQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.46% | 7.90% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.13% | 16.36% | +3.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.46% | 22.87% | +4.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 47.59% | 37.73% | +9.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.01% | 32.44% | +7.57% |
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KWEB has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than CHIQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
KWEB vs. CHIQ - Dividend Comparison
KWEB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than CHIQ's 1.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHIQ Global X MSCI China Consumer Discretionary ETF | 1.59% | 1.48% | 2.65% | 2.26% | 0.38% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 1.05% | 2.71% | 0.62% | 1.51% | 4.86% |
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF | 7.63% | 6.16% | 3.51% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 7.07% | 0.29% | 0.08% | 3.40% | 0.58% | 1.19% | 0.46% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KWEB and CHIQ have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KWEB has higher volatility (8.46%) compared to CHIQ (7.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KWEB dropped -80.92% vs CHIQ's -67.04%.
On 10-year performance, CHIQ leads with 6.23% vs 0.00% for KWEB. On fees, CHIQ is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CHIQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, CHIQ has performed better with a 6.23% return vs 0.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CHIQ is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.
KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 1.59% for CHIQ.
KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index, while CHIQ tracks MSCI China Consumer Discretionary 10/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for KWEB and 0.65% for CHIQ.
KWEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.64 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KWEB and CHIQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer