KVLE vs. KEMQ
KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) and KEMQ (KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KVLE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KEMQ is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KVLE returned 10.02%/yr vs -4.14%/yr for KEMQ. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KVLE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for KEMQ.
Performance
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 9.27% return, which is significantly higher than KEMQ's 2.13% return.
KVLE
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.18%
- YTD
- 9.27%
- 6M
- 8.32%
- 1Y
- 17.71%
- 3Y*
- 14.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.02%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMQ
- 1D
- -3.77%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- YTD
- 2.13%
- 6M
- 2.85%
- 1Y
- 21.94%
- 3Y*
- 22.94%
- 5Y*
- -4.14%
- 10Y*
- —
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 9.27% | 9.34% | 18.25% | 10.49% | -5.96% | 28.01% | 1.71% |
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 2.13% | 56.28% | 13.81% | 0.77% | -38.09% | -27.31% | 8.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between KVLE and KEMQ is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020 | 0.44 |
The correlation between KVLE and KEMQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.44 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KVLE
KEMQ
Technology
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
KVLE
KEMQ
Financial Services
KVLE
KEMQ
Real Estate
KVLE
KEMQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
KVLE
KEMQ
Healthcare
KVLE
KEMQ
Industrials
KVLE
KEMQ
Consumer Defensive
KVLE
KEMQ
Energy
KVLE
KEMQ
-
Communication Services
KVLE
KEMQ
Basic Materials
KVLE
KEMQ
-
Utilities
KVLE
KEMQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KVLE vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank
KVLE
KEMQ
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KVLE | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.78 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.85 | 1.00 | +0.85 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.07 | 2.59 | +4.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KEMQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVLE | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -70.72% | +52.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.59% | -21.94% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.39% | -21.94% | +5.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -66.02% | +47.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.76% | -31.41% | +29.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.19% | -35.64% | +32.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 8.49% | -5.98% |
Volatility
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is 3.68%, while KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a volatility of 11.75%. This indicates that KVLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KVLE | KEMQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.68% | 11.75% | -8.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.73% | 22.87% | -14.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.25% | 27.40% | -16.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.53% | 32.15% | -17.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.33% | 29.67% | -15.34% |
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
KVLE vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison
KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.37%, more than KEMQ's 5.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEMQ KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF | 5.16% | 5.27% | 0.73% | 0.29% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 2.28% | 1.76% |
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 7.37% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KVLE and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMQ has higher volatility (11.75%) compared to KVLE (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.
On 5-year performance, KVLE leads with 10.02% vs -4.14% for KEMQ. On fees, KVLE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KVLE has performed better with a 10.02% return vs -4.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KVLE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.
KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.37%, compared with 5.16% for KEMQ.
KVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEMQ is Emerging Markets Equities. KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.60% for KEMQ.
KVLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KVLE and KEMQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer