PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KVLE vs. KEMQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 11.23% return, which is significantly higher than KEMQ's 6.99% return.


KVLE

1D
0.29%
1M
4.55%
YTD
11.23%
6M
11.46%
1Y
20.71%
3Y*
15.28%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*

KEMQ

1D
-2.81%
1M
7.12%
YTD
6.99%
6M
8.35%
1Y
36.95%
3Y*
24.42%
5Y*
-2.87%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
11.23%9.34%18.25%10.49%-5.96%28.01%1.36%
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
6.99%56.28%13.81%0.77%-38.09%-27.31%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between KVLE and KEMQ is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 25, 2020

0.43

The correlation between KVLE and KEMQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.43 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
KVLE
KEMQ

Technology

27.0%
45.0%

Industrials

12.6%

-

Financial Services

12.2%

-

Real Estate

12.0%

-

Healthcare

9.3%
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

9.2%
33.0%

Consumer Defensive

6.8%
0.4%

Energy

4.6%

-

Communication Services

3.9%
15.5%

Basic Materials

1.3%

-

Utilities

0.7%

-

Technology

KVLE
27.0%
KEMQ
45.0%

Industrials

KVLE
12.6%
KEMQ

-

Financial Services

KVLE
12.2%
KEMQ

-

Real Estate

KVLE
12.0%
KEMQ

-

Healthcare

KVLE
9.3%
KEMQ
3.5%

Consumer Cyclical

KVLE
9.2%
KEMQ
33.0%

Consumer Defensive

KVLE
6.8%
KEMQ
0.4%

Energy

KVLE
4.6%
KEMQ

-

Communication Services

KVLE
3.9%
KEMQ
15.5%

Basic Materials

KVLE
1.3%
KEMQ

-

Utilities

KVLE
0.7%
KEMQ

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KVLE vs. KEMQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KVLE
KVLE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
KVLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KVLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
KVLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
KVLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
KVLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

KEMQ
KEMQ Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
KEMQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMQ Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMQ Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KVLEKEMQDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.89

1.42

+0.47

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.69

2.00

+0.69

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

1.69

+0.49

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.36

4.52

+3.84

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KVLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.89, which is higher than the KEMQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KVLE and KEMQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KVLEKEMQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.89

1.42

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

-0.09

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.06

+0.83

Drawdowns

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KEMQ drawdown of -70.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KEMQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KVLEKEMQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.38%

-70.72%

+52.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.59%

-21.94%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.39%

-21.94%

+5.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.38%

-66.02%

+47.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-28.14%

+28.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.21%

-35.69%

+32.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

8.20%

-5.70%

Volatility

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is 2.70%, while KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF (KEMQ) has a volatility of 10.09%. This indicates that KVLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KVLEKEMQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

10.09%

-7.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.32%

20.87%

-12.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.00%

26.14%

-15.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.51%

31.88%

-17.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.33%

29.58%

-15.25%

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than KEMQ's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

KVLE vs. KEMQ - Dividend Comparison

KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.24%, more than KEMQ's 4.92% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
KEMQ
KraneShares Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index ETF
4.92%5.27%0.73%0.29%0.00%0.28%2.28%1.76%
KVLE
KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF
7.24%7.90%7.99%2.53%5.78%9.51%0.35%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


KVLE and KEMQ have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KEMQ has higher volatility (10.09%) compared to KVLE (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs KEMQ's -70.72%.

On 5-year performance, KVLE leads with 9.95% vs -2.87% for KEMQ. On fees, KVLE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, KVLE has performed better with a 9.95% return vs -2.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KVLE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for KEMQ.

KVLE has the higher dividend yield at 7.24%, compared with 4.92% for KEMQ.

KVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEMQ is Emerging Markets Equities. KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KEMQ tracks Solactive Emerging Markets Consumer Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.60% for KEMQ.

KVLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KVLE and KEMQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer