KVLE vs. KWEB

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KVLE (KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF) and KWEB (KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KVLE is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KWEB is a China Equities fund tracking the CSI Overseas China Internet Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KVLE returned 10.20%/yr vs -13.12%/yr for KWEB. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KVLE charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for KWEB.

Performance

KVLE vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -22.97% return.

KVLE

• 1D: -0.40%
• 1M: 1.24%
• 6M: 9.42%
• YTD: 11.91%
• 1Y: 16.20%
• 3Y*: 14.25%
• 5Y*: 10.20%
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: -0.57%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: -30.35%
• YTD: -22.97%
• 1Y: -17.81%
• 3Y*: 0.03%
• 5Y*: -13.12%
• 10Y*: -0.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KVLE vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF	11.91%	9.34%	18.25%	10.49%	-5.96%	28.01%	1.71%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-22.97%	23.55%	12.01%	-9.06%	-17.24%	-49.01%	1.97%

Correlation

The correlation between KVLE and KWEB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.36
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2020	0.29

KVLE vs. KWEB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KVLE	KWEB
Technology	31.4%	19.5%
Financial Services	12.2%	1.9%
Real Estate	11.8%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	9.4%	34.3%
Healthcare	9.3%	5.9%
Industrials	8.9%	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	6.6%	3.0%
Energy	4.4%	-
Communication Services	4.1%	27.0%
Basic Materials	1.3%	-
Utilities	0.6%	-

Return for Risk

KVLE vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KVLE

KVLE Risk / Return Rank: 50
KVLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
KVLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
KVLE Omega Ratio Rank: 53
KVLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
KVLE Martin Ratio Rank: 49

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 5
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KVLE vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KVLE	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	-0.65	+2.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.09	-0.81	+2.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.91	+0.36
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.70	-0.43	+2.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.47	-0.87	+7.34

KVLE vs. KWEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KVLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the KWEB Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KVLE and KWEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

KVLE vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	KVLE	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.38%	-80.92%	+62.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.59%	-41.62%	+32.03%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.39%	-41.62%	+25.23%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.38%	-68.90%	+50.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.40%	-69.66%	+69.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.16%	-35.51%	+32.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.51%	20.57%	-18.06%

Volatility

KVLE vs. KWEB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is 2.88%, while KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB) has a volatility of 7.71%. This indicates that KVLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KWEB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	KVLE	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.88%	7.71%	-4.83%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.66%	20.51%	-11.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.15%	27.59%	-16.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.51%	47.58%	-33.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.28%	40.01%	-25.73%

KVLE vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than KWEB's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

KVLE vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.47%, less than KWEB's 7.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF	7.47%	7.90%	7.99%	2.53%	5.78%	9.51%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.99%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KVLE and KWEB in my portfolio?

KVLE and KWEB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, KVLE or KWEB?

KWEB has higher volatility (7.71%) compared to KVLE (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KVLE dropped -18.38% vs KWEB's -80.92%.

Which ETF is better, KVLE or KWEB?

On 5-year performance, KVLE leads with 10.20% vs -13.12% for KWEB. On fees, KVLE is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, KVLE has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, KVLE or KWEB?

Over the 5-year period, KVLE has performed better with a 10.20% return vs -13.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, KVLE or KWEB?

KVLE is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for KWEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KVLE or KWEB?

KWEB has the higher dividend yield at 7.99%, compared with 7.47% for KVLE.

What is the main difference between KVLE and KWEB?

KVLE is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KWEB is China Equities. KVLE tracks 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index, while KWEB tracks CSI Overseas China Internet Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for KVLE and 0.70% for KWEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

KVLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.