KVLE vs. KBA
Compare and contrast key facts about KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA).
KVLE and KBA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. KVLE is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the 3D/L Value Line Dynamic Core Equity Index. It was launched on Nov 24, 2020. KBA is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the MSCI China A Index. It was launched on Mar 5, 2014. Both KVLE and KBA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
KVLE vs. KBA - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
KVLE vs. KBA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | -2.24% | 9.34% | 18.25% | 10.49% | -5.96% | 28.01% | 1.36% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | -2.07% | 33.88% | 15.73% | -16.77% | -3.49% | 3.17% | 6.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KVLE achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than KBA's -2.07% return.
KVLE
- 1D
- 2.22%
- 1M
- -5.83%
- YTD
- -2.24%
- 6M
- -3.41%
- 1Y
- 8.52%
- 3Y*
- 10.14%
- 5Y*
- 8.53%
- 10Y*
- —
KBA
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -1.37%
- YTD
- -2.07%
- 6M
- 2.24%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 7.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.20%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
KVLE vs. KBA - Expense Ratio Comparison
KVLE has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than KBA's 0.60% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
KVLE vs. KBA — Risk / Return Rank
KVLE
KBA
KVLE vs. KBA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) and KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KVLE | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.53 | 1.63 | -1.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.87 | 2.20 | -1.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.32 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.83 | 2.54 | -1.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.33 | 10.01 | -6.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KVLE | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 | 1.63 | -1.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 0.19 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.31 | +0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between KVLE and KBA is 0.23, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
KVLE vs. KBA - Dividend Comparison
KVLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.23%, more than KBA's 1.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KVLE KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF | 8.23% | 7.90% | 7.99% | 2.53% | 5.78% | 9.51% | 0.35% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBA KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF | 1.60% | 1.56% | 2.18% | 2.34% | 49.05% | 9.07% | 0.65% | 1.53% | 3.77% | 1.46% | 6.62% | 29.08% |
Drawdowns
KVLE vs. KBA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KVLE drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, smaller than the maximum KBA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KVLE and KBA.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| KVLE | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -53.24% | +34.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.56% | -11.30% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -40.42% | +22.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.58% | -5.08% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -26.15% | +22.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 3.01% | -0.12% |
Volatility
KVLE vs. KBA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KFA Value Liner Dynamic Core Equity Index ETF (KVLE) is 4.47%, while KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A Share ETF (KBA) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that KVLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KBA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| KVLE | KBA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 5.63% | -1.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.57% | 11.80% | -3.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 18.64% | -2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.54% | 27.07% | -12.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.44% | 25.28% | -10.84% |