KURE vs. RBIL
KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KURE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KURE returned -8.44% vs 4.11% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. KURE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
KURE vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a -11.38% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.26% return.
KURE
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -6.04%
- YTD
- -11.38%
- 6M
- -14.30%
- 1Y
- -8.44%
- 3Y*
- -3.54%
- 5Y*
- -16.70%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- 2.26%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KURE vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | -11.38% | 16.97% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.26% | 2.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and RBIL is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KURE vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
KURE
RBIL
KURE vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -7.07 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 2.15 | -1.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 7.33 | -7.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 40.56 | -41.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KURE vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.53% | -0.56% | -67.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -0.56% | -30.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.41% | -0.56% | -60.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.21% | -0.07% | -38.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.75% | 0.10% | +14.65% |
Volatility
KURE vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a higher volatility of 7.51% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.36%. This indicates that KURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.51% | 0.36% | +7.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.06% | 0.85% | +17.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.19% | 0.94% | +25.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 1.07% | +30.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.33% | 1.07% | +31.26% |
KURE vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
KURE vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, more than RBIL's 4.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.73% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.39% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KURE and RBIL have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KURE has higher volatility (7.51%) compared to RBIL (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KURE dropped -68.53% vs RBIL's -0.56%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.11% vs -8.44% for KURE. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.11% return vs -8.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.
KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.39% for RBIL.
KURE is categorized as China Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KURE and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.40 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KURE and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer