KURE vs. RBIL
KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) and RBIL (F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - KURE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while RBIL is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, KURE returned -5.05% vs 4.57% for RBIL. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. KURE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for RBIL.
Performance
KURE vs. RBIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a -10.68% return, which is significantly lower than RBIL's 2.70% return.
KURE
- 1D
- -2.87%
- 1M
- -12.23%
- YTD
- -10.68%
- 6M
- -15.54%
- 1Y
- -5.05%
- 3Y*
- -6.04%
- 5Y*
- -16.33%
- 10Y*
- —
RBIL
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 2.70%
- 6M
- 2.79%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KURE vs. RBIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | -10.68% | 16.20% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 2.70% | 2.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and RBIL is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KURE vs. RBIL — Risk / Return Rank
KURE
RBIL
KURE vs. RBIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -8.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 2.39 | -1.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.18 | 17.00 | -17.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.39 | 70.66 | -71.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.19 | 5.01 | -5.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.11 | 4.28 | -4.38 |
Drawdowns
KURE vs. RBIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, which is greater than RBIL's maximum drawdown of -0.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and RBIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.53% | -0.50% | -68.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.53% | -0.27% | -27.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.11% | 0.00% | -61.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.07% | -0.06% | -38.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.13% | 0.07% | +13.06% |
Volatility
KURE vs. RBIL - Volatility Comparison
KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) has a higher volatility of 7.23% compared to F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) at 0.30%. This indicates that KURE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RBIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KURE | RBIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.23% | 0.30% | +6.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.67% | 0.79% | +16.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.49% | 0.92% | +25.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.86% | 1.05% | +30.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.39% | 1.05% | +31.34% |
KURE vs. RBIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than RBIL's 0.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
KURE vs. RBIL - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, more than RBIL's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.70% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% |
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.60% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KURE and RBIL have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KURE has higher volatility (7.23%) compared to RBIL (0.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KURE dropped -68.53% vs RBIL's -0.50%.
On 1-year performance, RBIL leads with 4.57% vs -5.05% for KURE. On fees, RBIL is cheaper at 0.17% per year. On volatility, RBIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, RBIL has performed better with a 4.57% return vs -5.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
RBIL is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for KURE.
KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.70%, compared with 4.60% for RBIL.
KURE is categorized as China Equities, while RBIL is Inflation-Protected Bonds. KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while RBIL tracks Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. They also come from different issuers: CICC and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KURE and 0.17% for RBIL.
RBIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.01 vs -0.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KURE and RBIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer