KURE vs. FXP
KURE (KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF) and FXP (ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50) are both exchange-traded funds - KURE is a China Equities fund tracking the MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while FXP is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KURE returned -16.64%/yr vs -12.36%/yr for FXP. At a correlation of -0.62, they often move in opposite directions. KURE charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for FXP.
Performance
KURE vs. FXP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KURE achieves a -11.03% return, which is significantly lower than FXP's 41.49% return.
KURE
- 1D
- 0.40%
- 1M
- -5.31%
- YTD
- -11.03%
- 6M
- -13.96%
- 1Y
- -8.07%
- 3Y*
- -3.44%
- 5Y*
- -16.64%
- 10Y*
- —
FXP
- 1D
- 5.21%
- 1M
- 25.84%
- YTD
- 41.49%
- 6M
- 43.45%
- 1Y
- 28.98%
- 3Y*
- -25.26%
- 5Y*
- -12.36%
- 10Y*
- -21.73%
KURE vs. FXP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | -11.03% | 24.87% | -17.83% | -17.70% | -25.43% | -16.01% | 68.97% | 34.30% | -30.01% |
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 41.49% | -45.32% | -52.46% | 12.74% | -11.73% | 23.56% | -39.47% | -29.01% | 48.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between KURE and FXP is -0.52, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2018 | -0.62 |
The correlation between KURE and FXP shifts across timeframes, from -0.63 (5 years) to -0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KURE vs. FXP — Risk / Return Rank
KURE
FXP
KURE vs. FXP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) and ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KURE | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.15 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.26 | 1.18 | -1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.54 | 2.07 | -2.61 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KURE vs. FXP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KURE drawdown since its inception was -68.53%, smaller than the maximum FXP drawdown of -99.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KURE and FXP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KURE | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.53% | -99.94% | +31.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.88% | -24.73% | -6.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -34.05% | -82.34% | +48.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.94% | -87.85% | +19.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -94.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -61.26% | -99.90% | +38.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -38.22% | -94.15% | +55.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 14.85% | 14.07% | +0.78% |
Volatility
KURE vs. FXP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF (KURE) is 7.54%, while ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 (FXP) has a volatility of 12.89%. This indicates that KURE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KURE | FXP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.54% | 12.89% | -5.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.04% | 29.92% | -11.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.09% | 39.64% | -13.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.85% | 63.24% | -31.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.32% | 54.79% | -22.47% |
KURE vs. FXP - Expense Ratio Comparison
KURE has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than FXP's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
KURE vs. FXP - Dividend Comparison
KURE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than FXP's 2.54% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FXP ProShares UltraShort FTSE China 50 | 2.54% | 9.57% | 3.55% | 2.20% | 0.06% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 1.20% | 0.16% |
KURE KraneShares MSCI All China Health Care Index ETF | 4.71% | 4.19% | 1.29% | 0.65% | 0.05% | 14.12% | 0.00% | 0.25% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KURE and FXP have a correlation of -0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FXP has higher volatility (12.89%) compared to KURE (7.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KURE dropped -68.53% vs FXP's -99.94%.
On 5-year performance, FXP leads with -12.36% vs -16.64% for KURE. On fees, KURE is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, KURE has been the lower-risk option at 7.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FXP has performed better with a -12.36% return vs -16.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KURE is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for FXP.
KURE has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 2.54% for FXP.
KURE is categorized as China Equities, while FXP is Leveraged Equities. KURE tracks MSCI China All Shares Health Care 10/40 Index, while FXP tracks FTSE China 50 Net Tax USD (TR) (-200%). They also come from different issuers: CICC and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for KURE and 0.95% for FXP.
FXP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KURE and FXP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer