KULR vs. QTUM
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock, while QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. Over the past 5 years, KULR returned -28.07%/yr vs 28.09%/yr for QTUM. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KULR vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.
KULR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 28.04%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- -61.48%
- 3Y*
- -12.23%
- 5Y*
- -28.07%
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
KULR vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 28.04% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -56.52% | 87.76% | -2.00% | -42.31% | -3.70% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 36.65% | 50.54% | 39.86% | -28.80% | 35.18% | 42.05% | 47.99% | -19.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and QTUM is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018 | 0.28 |
Over the past year, KULR and QTUM have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
QTUM
KULR vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.46 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 5.46 | -6.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 19.77 | -20.82 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than QTUM's maximum drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -38.45% | -58.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.04% | -15.26% | -62.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -25.39% | -69.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | -38.45% | -58.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.13% | -4.42% | -85.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.25% | -8.24% | -58.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.77% | 4.21% | +56.56% |
Volatility
KULR vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 38.71% compared to Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM) at 14.18%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTUM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.71% | 14.18% | +24.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.01% | 23.17% | +53.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.97% | 28.39% | +77.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.04% | 26.99% | +99.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.06% | 27.40% | +99.66% |
Dividends
KULR vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTUM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and QTUM have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (38.71%) compared to QTUM (14.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs QTUM's -38.45%.
QTUM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer