KULR vs. QBTS
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) and QBTS (D-Wave Quantum Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — KULR in Electronic Components, QBTS in Computer Hardware. Over the past 3 years, KULR returned -12.23%/yr vs 123.62%/yr for QBTS. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KULR vs. QBTS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly higher than QBTS's -10.63% return.
KULR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 28.04%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- -61.48%
- 3Y*
- -12.23%
- 5Y*
- -28.07%
- 10Y*
- —
QBTS
- 1D
- -1.89%
- 1M
- 9.00%
- YTD
- -10.63%
- 6M
- -10.46%
- 1Y
- 47.17%
- 3Y*
- 123.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KULR vs. QBTS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 28.04% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -84.58% | -24.53% |
QBTS D-Wave Quantum Inc | -10.63% | 211.31% | 854.44% | -38.88% | -83.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and QBTS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2022 | 0.29 |
Over the past year, KULR and QBTS have become more correlated (0.59) than their long-term average of 0.29, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
KULR:
$150.57M
QBTS:
$8.59B
KULR:
-$1.57
QBTS:
-$1.08
KULR:
9.25
QBTS:
637.12
KULR:
1.24
QBTS:
7.64
KULR:
$16.17M
QBTS:
$12.44M
KULR:
$770.97K
QBTS:
$8.25M
KULR:
-$60.59M
QBTS:
-$399.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. QBTS — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
QBTS
KULR vs. QBTS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.16 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 0.67 | -1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 1.16 | -2.22 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. QBTS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum QBTS drawdown of -96.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and QBTS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -96.67% | -0.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.04% | -71.01% | -7.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -79.17% | -15.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.13% | -47.81% | -42.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.25% | -65.66% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.77% | 40.64% | +20.13% |
Volatility
KULR vs. QBTS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) is 38.71%, while D-Wave Quantum Inc (QBTS) has a volatility of 42.66%. This indicates that KULR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QBTS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | QBTS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.71% | 42.66% | -3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.01% | 76.89% | +0.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.97% | 108.46% | -2.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.04% | 150.99% | -24.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.06% | 150.99% | -23.93% |
Dividends
KULR vs. QBTS - Dividend Comparison
Neither KULR nor QBTS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
KULR vs. QBTS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and D-Wave Quantum Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and QBTS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QBTS has higher volatility (42.66%) compared to KULR (38.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs QBTS's -96.67%.
QBTS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.44 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and QBTS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer