PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
KULR vs. MU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

KULR vs. MU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 26.01% return, which is significantly lower than MU's 232.74% return.


KULR

1D
-2.10%
1M
29.07%
YTD
26.01%
6M
-3.62%
1Y
-60.49%
3Y*
-11.82%
5Y*
-29.09%
10Y*

MU

1D
9.87%
1M
27.11%
YTD
232.74%
6M
284.77%
1Y
776.52%
3Y*
144.94%
5Y*
65.39%
10Y*
55.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KULR vs. MU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
26.01%-89.58%1,818.92%-84.58%-56.52%87.76%-2.00%-42.31%73.33%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
232.74%240.24%-0.96%71.93%-45.93%24.21%39.79%69.49%-44.77%

Correlation

The correlation between KULR and MU is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 19, 2018

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

KULR:

$148.18M

MU:

$1.08T

EPS

KULR:

-$1.57

MU:

$21.26

PS Ratio

KULR:

9.11

MU:

18.53

PB Ratio

KULR:

1.22

MU:

14.94

Total Revenue (TTM)

KULR:

$16.17M

MU:

$58.12B

Gross Profit (TTM)

KULR:

$770.97K

MU:

$33.96B

EBITDA (TTM)

KULR:

-$60.59M

MU:

$25.99B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

KULR vs. MU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KULR
KULR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

MU
MU Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
MU Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
MU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MU Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KULR vs. MU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


KULRMUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-12.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.81

-0.87

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.76

25.90

-26.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.99

100.37

-101.37

KULR vs. MU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current KULR Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the MU Sharpe Ratio of 11.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of KULR and MU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


KULRMUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.57

11.44

-12.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

1.24

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.11

0.31

-0.42

Drawdowns

KULR vs. MU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, roughly equal to the maximum MU drawdown of -98.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and MU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


KULRMUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.23%

-98.25%

+1.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-79.80%

-30.28%

-49.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-94.74%

-57.63%

-37.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-96.86%

-57.63%

-39.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.29%

-12.07%

-78.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.23%

-58.19%

-8.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

60.84%

7.80%

+53.04%

Volatility

KULR vs. MU - Volatility Comparison

KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 47.09% compared to Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) at 34.16%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


KULRMUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

47.09%

34.16%

+12.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.46%

56.74%

+19.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

106.05%

68.70%

+37.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

126.05%

52.91%

+73.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

126.51%

49.99%

+76.52%

Dividends

KULR vs. MU - Dividend Comparison

KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
KULR
KULR Technology Group, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MU
Micron Technology, Inc.
0.05%0.16%0.55%0.54%0.89%0.21%

Financials

KULR vs. MU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between KULR Technology Group, Inc. and Micron Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.86M
23.86B
(KULR) Total Revenue
(MU) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


KULR and MU have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KULR has higher volatility (47.09%) compared to MU (34.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs MU's -98.25%.

MU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.44 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for KULR and MU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer