KULR vs. MAGS
KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) is a stock, while MAGS (Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, KULR returned -12.23%/yr vs 31.29%/yr for MAGS. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
KULR vs. MAGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KULR achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly higher than MAGS's -1.59% return.
KULR
- 1D
- -0.79%
- 1M
- -6.42%
- YTD
- 28.04%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- -61.48%
- 3Y*
- -12.23%
- 5Y*
- -28.07%
- 10Y*
- —
MAGS
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.97%
- YTD
- -1.59%
- 6M
- -0.43%
- 1Y
- 23.09%
- 3Y*
- 31.29%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KULR vs. MAGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 28.04% | -89.58% | 1,818.92% | -77.43% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | -1.59% | 22.99% | 63.97% | 35.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between KULR and MAGS is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2023 | 0.25 |
The correlation between KULR and MAGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (all time) to 0.37 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KULR vs. MAGS — Risk / Return Rank
KULR
MAGS
KULR vs. MAGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) and Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KULR | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.20 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.79 | 1.25 | -2.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 4.21 | -5.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KULR vs. MAGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KULR drawdown since its inception was -97.23%, which is greater than MAGS's maximum drawdown of -29.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KULR and MAGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KULR | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.23% | -29.91% | -67.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -78.04% | -18.62% | -59.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -94.74% | -29.91% | -64.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -96.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.13% | -8.50% | -81.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -66.25% | -4.72% | -61.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 60.77% | 5.50% | +55.27% |
Volatility
KULR vs. MAGS - Volatility Comparison
KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a higher volatility of 38.71% compared to Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF (MAGS) at 5.86%. This indicates that KULR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KULR | MAGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 38.71% | 5.86% | +32.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.01% | 15.07% | +61.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.97% | 20.30% | +85.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 126.04% | 25.97% | +100.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 127.06% | 25.97% | +101.09% |
Dividends
KULR vs. MAGS - Dividend Comparison
KULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MAGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MAGS Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF | 1.50% | 1.48% | 0.81% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KULR and MAGS have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KULR has higher volatility (38.71%) compared to MAGS (5.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KULR dropped -97.23% vs MAGS's -29.91%.
MAGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KULR and MAGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer