KSTR vs. CN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

KSTR (KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF) and CN (Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF) are both China Equities funds - KSTR tracks the SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index while CN tracks the MSCI China All Shares. Both are passively managed. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KSTR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for CN.

Performance

KSTR vs. CN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

KSTR

• 1D: -5.54%
• 1M: 17.74%
• 6M: 33.72%
• YTD: 52.98%
• 1Y: 108.49%
• 3Y*: 24.92%
• 5Y*: 1.09%
• 10Y*: —

CN

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

KSTR vs. CN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	52.98%	42.82%	6.12%	-17.93%	-38.51%	-2.01%
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-3.10%	-11.87%	-23.85%	-21.63%

Correlation

The correlation between KSTR and CN is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.24
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021	0.40

The correlation between KSTR and CN shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.40 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

KSTR vs. CN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	KSTR	CN
Technology	86.3%	0.3%
Industrials	6.6%	1.0%
Healthcare	5.7%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	0.9%	5.4%
Energy	0.9%	0.9%
Basic Materials	0.6%	0.6%
Communication Services	-	0.4%
Consumer Defensive	-	0.3%
Financial Services	-	55.1%
Real Estate	-	0.8%
Utilities	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

KSTR vs. CN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KSTR

KSTR Risk / Return Rank: 90
KSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
KSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
KSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 87
KSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
KSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

CN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

KSTR vs. CN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF (KSTR) and Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF (CN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	KSTR	CN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.17	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.16	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.79	—	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	KSTR	CN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.70%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-41.55%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-66.31%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.99%	—	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-38.15%	—	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.36%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	KSTR	CN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.33%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.29%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	41.01%	—	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.31%	—	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.44%	—	—

KSTR vs. CN - Expense Ratio Comparison

KSTR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than CN's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

KSTR vs. CN - Dividend Comparison

Neither KSTR nor CN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CN Xtrackers MSCI All China Equity ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	4.04%	1.80%	2.00%	0.78%	4.18%	2.09%	0.81%	11.41%	14.00%
KSTR KraneShares SSE STAR Market 50 Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both KSTR and CN in my portfolio?

KSTR and CN have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, KSTR or CN?

On fees, CN is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, KSTR or CN?

CN is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for KSTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, KSTR or CN?

KSTR and CN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between KSTR and CN?

KSTR tracks SSE Science and Technology Innovation Board 50 Index, while CN tracks MSCI China All Shares. They also come from different issuers: KraneShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for KSTR and 0.50% for CN.