KROP vs. IGV
KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, KROP returned -11.81%/yr vs 3.63%/yr for IGV. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGV.
Performance
KROP vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 15.64% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -7.81% return.
KROP
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- 6M
- 5.85%
- YTD
- 15.64%
- 1Y
- 11.84%
- 3Y*
- 0.14%
- 5Y*
- -11.81%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -12.64%
IGV
- 1D
- 3.00%
- 1M
- 4.11%
- 6M
- 8.85%
- YTD
- -7.81%
- 1Y
- -10.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.00%
- 5Y*
- 3.63%
- 10Y*
- 16.04%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.49%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.47B | $1.27B | $1.69B | |
| $48.18K | $49.05K | $92.40K |
KROP vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 15.64% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -19.99% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | -7.81% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 0.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP and IGV is 0.00, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.40 |
Over the past year, the correlation between KROP and IGV has dropped to 0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.40, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
KROP vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KROP
IGV
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
KROP
IGV
Basic Materials
KROP
IGV
-
Consumer Defensive
KROP
IGV
-
Healthcare
KROP
IGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
KROP
IGV
Communication Services
KROP
-
IGV
Energy
KROP
-
IGV
-
Financial Services
KROP
-
IGV
Real Estate
KROP
-
IGV
-
Technology
KROP
-
IGV
Utilities
KROP
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
KROP
IGV
KROP vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 0.96 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.23 | -0.28 | +1.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.56 | -0.53 | +3.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
KROP vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -62.08%, roughly equal to the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.08% | -63.45% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -36.61% | +26.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.19% | -36.61% | +11.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.96% | -45.85% | -16.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.50% | -17.28% | -32.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.81% | -14.49% | -30.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.63% | 19.38% | -14.75% |
Volatility
KROP vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is 4.77%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) has a volatility of 7.40%. This indicates that KROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 7.40% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.77% | 25.09% | -12.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.50% | 29.25% | -12.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.13% | 28.21% | -6.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.11% | 26.47% | -4.36% |
KROP vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, more than IGV's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.13% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP and IGV have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (7.40%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -62.08% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 5-year performance, IGV leads with 3.63% vs -11.81% for KROP. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IGV has performed better with a 3.63% return vs -11.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.13%, compared with 0.02% for IGV.
KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.39% for IGV.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KROP and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer