KROP vs. IGV
KROP (Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF) and IGV (iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET) are both Technology Equities funds - KROP tracks the Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index while IGV tracks the S&P North American Technology-Software Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, KROP returned 0.81%/yr vs 14.91%/yr for IGV. At a 0.41 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. KROP charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for IGV.
Performance
KROP vs. IGV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, KROP achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly higher than IGV's -5.19% return.
KROP
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -0.06%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.63%
- 1Y
- 13.67%
- 3Y*
- 0.81%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IGV
- 1D
- -4.33%
- 1M
- 13.30%
- YTD
- -5.19%
- 6M
- -6.07%
- 1Y
- -4.56%
- 3Y*
- 14.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.80%
- 10Y*
- 16.89%
KROP vs. IGV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 16.34% | 7.95% | -8.74% | -23.86% | -27.23% | -18.75% |
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | -5.19% | 5.56% | 23.41% | 58.56% | -35.65% | 1.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between KROP and IGV is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2021 | 0.41 |
The correlation between KROP and IGV shifts across timeframes, from -0.00 (1 year) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
KROP vs. IGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
KROP
IGV
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Industrials
KROP
IGV
Basic Materials
KROP
IGV
-
Consumer Defensive
KROP
IGV
-
Healthcare
KROP
IGV
-
Consumer Cyclical
KROP
IGV
Communication Services
KROP
-
IGV
Energy
KROP
-
IGV
-
Financial Services
KROP
-
IGV
Real Estate
KROP
-
IGV
-
Technology
KROP
-
IGV
Utilities
KROP
-
IGV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
KROP vs. IGV — Risk / Return Rank
KROP
IGV
KROP vs. IGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) and iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.99 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | -0.13 | +1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.75 | -0.27 | +3.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | -0.17 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.57 | 0.37 | -0.94 |
Drawdowns
KROP vs. IGV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum KROP drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, roughly equal to the maximum IGV drawdown of -63.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for KROP and IGV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.96% | -63.45% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -36.61% | +25.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.70% | -36.61% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -45.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.05% | -14.93% | -34.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.50% | -14.44% | -30.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.99% | 17.22% | -12.23% |
Volatility
KROP vs. IGV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF (KROP) is 4.77%, while iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET (IGV) has a volatility of 11.63%. This indicates that KROP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| KROP | IGV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | 11.63% | -6.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.01% | 24.39% | -12.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.04% | 27.61% | -11.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 27.86% | -5.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.28% | 26.35% | -4.07% |
KROP vs. IGV - Expense Ratio Comparison
KROP has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IGV's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
KROP vs. IGV - Dividend Comparison
KROP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, while IGV has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGV iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ET | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.35% | 0.02% | 0.16% | 0.09% | 0.82% | 0.22% |
KROP Global X AgTech & Food Innovation ETF | 2.35% | 2.73% | 1.89% | 1.36% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
KROP and IGV have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IGV has higher volatility (11.63%) compared to KROP (4.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, KROP dropped -61.96% vs IGV's -63.45%.
On 3-year performance, IGV leads with 14.91% vs 0.81% for KROP. On fees, IGV is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, KROP has been the lower-risk option at 4.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IGV has performed better with a 14.91% return vs 0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGV is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for KROP.
KROP has the higher dividend yield at 2.35%, compared with 0.00% for IGV.
KROP tracks Solactive AgTech & Food Innovation Index, while IGV tracks S&P North American Technology-Software Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for KROP and 0.46% for IGV.
KROP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for KROP and IGV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer